Search Results for "Karnataka Land Records"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Karnataka Land Records"

698 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 698 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Revision Order Setting Aside Mutation Entry After 14 Years — State's Petition Dismissed. Suo Motu Revision Under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 Held Invalid for Lack of Notice and Unreasonable Delay.

1 Apr 2026

The case involves four writ petitions filed against an order dated 22.09.2010 passed by the Special Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru District, in procee...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in ISKCON Property and Management Dispute — Upholds High Court's Findings on Governing Body and Ownership of Properties. The Court held that the plaintiffs failed to prove their claim to the Governing Body of ISKCON Bangalore and that the properties in dispute belonged to ISKCON Mumbai, not ISKCON Bangalore.

16 May 2025

The Supreme Court of India heard a group of civil appeals arising from two suits concerning the International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCO...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Endorsement Denying Land Conversion in Land Reforms Dispute — Petitioner's Father's Tenancy Rights Recognized Despite Rival Claims. The Deputy Tahsildar's denial of conversion was set aside as premature pending adjudication of rival occupancy claims under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

19 Dec 2024

The petitioner, Staney Herald D'Souza, challenged an endorsement dated 23.08.2016 issued by the Deputy Tahsildar, Udupi, which denied conversion of th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Land Revenue Dispute — Upholds Deputy Commissioner's Order for Possession. Challenge to Revenue Entries and Possessory Rights Negatived as Appellants Failed to Establish Title or Valid Lease.

5 Jul 2024

The case involves an intra-court appeal filed by M/S Neria Estates Rural Industries Association Pvt. Ltd. and its Managing Director against the State ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Tribunal Order for Violation of Natural Justice in Occupancy Certificate Proceedings. Land Tribunal's order set aside as it was passed without notice to petitioners and without considering their objections under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

4 Apr 2024

The petitioners, who are agriculturists, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 30.1...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Upholds Single Judge Order for Restoration of Possession or Compensation. Land Acquisition Lapses Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as Possession Not Taken and Compensation Not Paid Within Five Years of Award.

7 Jul 2023

The State of Karnataka filed an intra-court appeal challenging the order dated 13.01.2021 passed by a learned Single Judge in W.P.No.61563/2011 (LA-RE...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Land Revenue Case — Tahsildar's Order Under Section 140(2) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 Restored. Single Judge Erred in Quashing Mutation Entry Without Considering Appellant's Right to Be Heard and Limitation for Challenge.

10 Mar 2022

The appellant, Sunil Chajed, claimed to be the owner of land measuring 1 acre and 4.08 guntas bearing Sy.No.91/1A. The Tahsildar, Bengaluru East Taluk...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suo Motu Revision Order Under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 Initiated After 48 Years — Unreasonable Delay and Lack of Notice Vitiate Proceedings. The court held that the power of suo motu revision must be exercised within a reasonable period, and a delay of 48 years is unreasonable; further, the order passed without notice to the grantee violates natural justice and is void.

9 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Mr. Ramakrishna M, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Tribunal Order in Land Reforms Act Case — Upholds Grant of Occupancy Rights to Tenants Based on Consistent Evidence of Cultivation.

9 Jul 2019

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the petitioners (Yusuff Ali Khan and others) challenging the order dated 30.11.2007 passed by the Land T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Payment of Compensation for Railway Encroachment on Private Land Without Acquisition. Petitioner's land used for railway line without acquisition proceedings; court orders compensation under RFCTLARR Act, 2013.

29 Aug 2018

The petitioner, Sumit S/o Ashokkumar Bharadiya, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad alleging that the Railway Authorities...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)