High Court of Judicature at Madras Hears Batch of Writ Petitions by Former Temporary Staff Seeking Regularisation and Absorption — Petitioners Implead Registrar General, Labour Court, and District Judiciary as Respondents
9 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "Internal Audit"
174 result(s) found
Found 174 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Auction of Mineral Block Due to Technical Glitch. Alleged Portal Failure Not Sufficient to Invalidate Auction Where Petitioner Failed to Demonstrate Prejudice and Did Not Follow Up After Initial Technical Issue.
25 Jun 2026The petitioner, Agravanshi Private Limited, challenged the auction process for Cavorem-Maina Mineral Block No. XVIII conducted by MSTC Limited on beha...
- 21
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice and Order in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Full and True Disclosure Finding and Non-Disposal of Objections. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid as No Failure to Disclose Material Facts Alleged Under Section 147 First Proviso of Income Tax Act, 1961.
27 Feb 2025The petitioner, Crystal Pride Developers, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development, filed its original return of income for Assessment Ye...
- 558
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging CBDT's Rejection of Delay Condonation for Filing Revised Income Tax Returns. Non-Speaking Order and Violation of Natural Justice Led to Remand for Fresh Consideration Under Section 119 of Income Tax Act, 1961.
30 Apr 2024The petitioner, CG Power and Industrial Solutions Ltd., a company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bom...
- 23
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material — Reopening Based on Change of Opinion Not Permissible. The court held that the Assessing Officer cannot reopen an assessment on the same material already examined in the original assessment under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
10 Feb 2023The petitioner, Bharat Amratlal Shah, challenged a notice dated 31 March 2021 issued under Section 148 read with Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 19...
- 12
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds FCRA Amendments in Challenge by NGOs — Restrictions on Foreign Contribution Transfers and Mandatory Account in SBI New Delhi Held Reasonable. Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Sections 7, 12(1A), 12A, and 17(1) of Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Act, 2020 as Not Violative of Articles 14, 19, and 21.
8 Apr 2022The judgment concerns the constitutional validity of amendments to the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 (FCRA) introduced by the Foreign Co...
- 306
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Bank Manager in Embezzlement Case — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Prove Criminal Conspiracy and Misappropriation of Funds
13 Dec 2021The appellant, N. Raghavender, was the Branch Manager of Sri Rama Grameena Bank, Nizamabad Branch from May 1990 to September 1995. He was convicted by...
- 308
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Partially Strikes Down FCRA Amendment Act 2020 — Ban on Transfer of Foreign Funds and Mandatory Aadhaar Held Unconstitutional. The court upheld the requirement of a single FCRA account at SBI New Delhi as a reasonable regulatory measure to prevent misuse of foreign funds.
1 Jan 2021The judgment deals with a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of certain amendments made to the Foreign Contribution (Regu...
- 315
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Challenging University Notification on Revaluation of PG Medical Answer Scripts — University Directed to Conduct Fresh Valuation by Different Examiners. The court held that the University's notification restricting revaluation to only one theory paper was arbitrary and violative of the right to fair evaluation under the Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences Act.
27 Sep 2016The petitioners, Dr. Haritha Ravipati and Mr. Mamidi Varun, were postgraduate medical students who appeared for the M.D. Dermatology examination condu...
- 36
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes University Notification Requiring Minimum 50% Marks in Each Theory Paper for MD Dermatology Examination — Directs Fresh Valuation of Answer Scripts. University Cannot Impose Additional Eligibility Criteria Beyond MCI Regulations; Notification Dated 1.7.2015 Held Arbitrary and Illegal.
27 Sep 2016The petitioners, Dr. Haritha Ravipati and Mr. Mamidi Varun, were postgraduate medical students who appeared for the MD Dermatology examination conduct...
- 38
