Search Results for "Income Tax Act 1922"

263 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 263 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order in Income Tax Case. ITSC's order under Section 245D(4) of Income Tax Act, 1961 upheld as valid and not perverse.

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central – II, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 31st July 2013 passed by the Income Tax Settl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Assessee's Right to Carry Forward Loss as Vocation Income Under Income-tax Act, 1922. Hold that Decision on Loss in Previous Year Not Binding on Subsequent Year's Officer Under Section 24(2).

The assessee, Manmohandas, was appointed as Treasurer of a Bank in respect of certain branches, sub-agencies, and pay offices. During the previous yea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging CBDT Circular Denying Adjustment of TDS Against Tax Payable Under Voluntary Disclosure Scheme. Circular No. 755 dated 25-07-1997 Held Ultra Vires as It Imposed Restriction Not Found in Finance Act, 1997 or Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Earnest Business Services Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, and its director, filed a writ petition und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dharwad Bench Hears Revenue Appeal Against ITAT Order Deleting Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) for Assessment Year 2006-07 Due to Defective Notice; Questions Validity of Penalty Initiation Despite Retrospective Amendment to Section 271(1B)

The appeal before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, arose from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bengaluru, which had allowed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Income Tax Search and Seizure Action Under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Court Holds That Formation of Reason to Believe by the Authorizing Officer Is Based on Material on Record and Not Open to Challenge Unless Malafide or No Material Exists.

The petitioners, a private limited company and its directors and their relatives, challenged the search and seizure action conducted on 9th and 10th J...