Search Results for "Family Court Order"

14807 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 14807 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court hears writ petitions challenging a caste validity certificate of 'Mochi' Scheduled Caste. Petitions allege forged documents and procedural irregularities in the scrutiny committee's order, but the final decision is not stated in the provided judgment extract.

The judgment before the Bombay High Court concerned three connected writ petitions arising from a dispute over the caste validity certificate of Miss ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Application for Perjury Proceedings Against Wife in Family Court Appeal. False statements in pleadings alone do not warrant prosecution under Section 340 Cr.P.C. without proof of intentional falsehood and necessity for prosecution.

The applicant, Dr. Santosh Chandrashekar Shetty (husband), filed a Civil Application under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds High Court Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Under Section 29A(4) of Arbitration Act for Extension of Time. The term 'Court' in Section 29A(4) is interpreted to mean the High Court, not the Civil Court, to ensure uniformity and avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

The case arose from a dispute between Jagdeep Chowgule (appellant) and Sheela Chowgule & Ors. (respondents) concerning the jurisdiction to entertain a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Civil Revision Applications Against Appellate Order Upholding Obstructionist Right to Occupy Shops on Leased Land. Eviction Decree Against Tenants Did Not Automatically Extinguish Obstructionists' Possession Under Bombay Rent Act and Maharashtra Rent Control Act.

These Civil Revision Applications were filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 challenging the common judgment and order dated 4 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Division Bench Order in Trade Mark Infringement Suit Due to Non-maintainable Intra-court Appeal. The Single Judge's Order Granting Time to File Affidavit-in-Opposition Was Not a 'Judgment' Under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, Making the Appeal Inadmissible.

The dispute arose from a civil suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff against the appellant-defendants for infringement of the registered trade mark '...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Decree on Admission in Commercial Suit — Decree for Rs.4.25 Crores Granted on Alleged Admission in Claim for Rs.22.66 Crore

The appeal arises from an order dated 28 April 2023 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Notice of Motion No. 2393 of 2019 in ...