Search Results for "Estate Duty Act 1953"

72 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 72 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Initiates Suo Motu Criminal Contempt Proceedings Against Advocate. Written Material Scandalised the Court, Lowering its Dignity and Interfering with Administration of Justice, Violating Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

This is a suo motu criminal contempt proceeding initiated by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay against Mrs. Vineeta Srinandan. The court took cog...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Directs Shifting of Date for Determining Market Value Due to Inordinate Delay. Compensation to be Determined as on Date of Award Instead of Preliminary Notification Under Section 28 of KIAD Act, 1966.

The appellants, Bernard Francis Joseph Vaz and others, purchased residential sites in Gottigere Village, Bengaluru between 1995 and 1997. On 3rd April...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Restitution to Judgment Debtor Under Section 144 CPC When Decree Varied and Decree Holder Purchased Property in Auction. Auction Sale Set Aside Due to Variation of Decree and Lack of Bona Fide Purchaser Status.

The appeal arose from a restitution application under Section 144 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC). The original plaintiff (decree holder) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Decree Granting Letters of Administration in Will Dispute. Will Proved in Accordance with Law, No Suspicious Circumstances Found Under Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The case involves a dispute over the estate of E. Srinivasa Pillai, who died on 19th January 1978. The plaintiffs, C. Saradambal (widow of the testato...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Central Excise Appeal — No Power to Review Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944. Section 35L of the Act Bars Application of CPC Provisions on Review, Hence Review Petition Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, VIP Industries Ltd., filed a review petition before the Bombay High Court seeking review of an earlier order that dismissed its applic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee in Income Tax Reference Under Section 256(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Profits on Sale of Machinery Not Taxable Under Section 41(2) as Depreciation Was Claimed by Dissolved Firm, Not by Assessee.

The case involves a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, for the opinion of the Bo...