Search Results for "District Grievance Redressal Officer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "District Grievance Redressal Officer"

306 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 306 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Electricity Company's Petition Challenging CGRF Order Directing Refund of Differential Tariff. Reclassification of Petrol Pump from Industrial to Commercial Tariff Upheld as Per Commercial Circular No.175 and MERC Tariff Order; CGRF Exceeded Jurisdiction by Not Considering Limitation Under Section 56(2) of Electricity Act, 2003.

27 Apr 2026

The petitioner, the Executive Engineer and Nodal Officer of Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., challenged the order dated 29.06....

High Court

Protecting the Fundamental Right to Liberty under Article 21. Illegal Arrest of a Decorated Police Officer: Bombay High Court Awards Compensation for Violation of Fundamental Rights.

25 Nov 2024

The Bombay High Court, in the case of Sambhaji Achyutrao Patil v. State of Maharashtra & Ors., addressed the illegal arrest and detention of a se...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Allowances for Judicial Officers as Recommended by Second National Judicial Pay Commission. The Court rejected objections based on financial burden and equivalence with other government officers, holding that providing service conditions is a mandatory state duty essential for judicial functions and rule of law.

4 Jan 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a judgment delivered by Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI, addressed objections from the Union Government and State Gove...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Upholds Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Order Restricting Electricity Bill to 24 Months in Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited v. Head Master, Anudanit Prathamik Ashram Shala. The Court held that Regulation 6.4 of the MERC Regulations 2006 limits billing to 24 months prior to issuance, and the Forum's order was not perverse.

19 Jul 2022

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited, challenged an order dated 08.06.2016 passed by the Consumer Grievance Redr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Electricity Distribution Company Challenging Consumer Forum Order Setting Aside Supplementary Bills. Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Has Jurisdiction Under Section 42(5) of Electricity Act, 2003 to Adjudicate Disputes Regarding Defective Metering and Supplementary Bills.

18 Dec 2018

The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 25.03.2017 passed by the Cons...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Passes Interim Orders Directing Restoration of Lake and Prevention of Mangrove Destruction in Navi Mumbai. Modification of Development Plan to Permit Golf Course Raised Public Interest Concerns.

1 Nov 2018

The public interest litigations were filed to address the systematic destruction of mangroves and wetlands in Navi Mumbai. The petitioners in PIL 218/...

High Court

KAHC010026042017_1

9 Mar 2018

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lokayukta Report in Mining Lease Dispute — Report Under Section 12(3) of Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 Set Aside for Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Lack of Jurisdiction. The Lokayukta's recommendation to cancel mining lease and initiate criminal proceedings was quashed as the petitioner was not heard before the report was made.

13 Jul 2015

The petitioner, M/s Kumaraswamy Mineral Exports Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a report d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Execution of Decrees Under Section 101 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact by Cooperative Courts. The court held that under Article 227 of the Constitution, it cannot interfere with concurrent findings of fact unless perverse or without jurisdiction.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orders passed in execution proceedings und...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Orders of Ombudsman under Mahatma Gandhi Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme. Petitions Filed by Government Servants and Private Individuals Seeking to Quash Recovery and Penalty Orders Passed by Ombudsman.

1 Jan 1970

Multiple writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging orders passed by the Ombudsman unde...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)