Search Results for "Directory Requirement"

263 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 263 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Interprets Section 175(4) BNSS in Sexual Assault Case Against Police Officers -- Clarifies Public Servant Immunity and Investigation Procedures Under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

The Supreme Court addressed a criminal appeal involving interpretation of Section 175(4) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) -- The app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows PIL Challenging MCI's Rejection of PG Seat Increase Applications for Lack of Consent of Affiliation. The court held that the requirement of Consent of Affiliation is directory and not mandatory, and that the MCI must process the applications on merits.

The Indian Medical Association, Nagpur, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging a communication dated 28-12-2012 issued by the Board of Governo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Award for Rabies Vaccine Supply — Performance Certificate Not in Prescribed Proforma but Substantially Compliant. Condition Held Directory, Not Mandatory; No Interference in Tender Award Absent Arbitrariness.

The petitioner, Bharat Biotech International Ltd, challenged the grant of a tender for supply of rabies vaccine by the Municipal Corporation of Greate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SAFEMA Forfeiture Case — Notice to Convict Not Mandatory When Property Held by Relatives. The Court held that proceedings against relatives under Section 6 of SAFEMA are independent and do not require prior notice to the convict.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a Madras High Court judgment that had set aside forfeiture orders under the Smugglers and Foreign Exc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree in Suit for Recovery of Money — Sets Aside Order Rejecting Application Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC. Failure to Serve Summons Properly and Lack of Knowledge of Proceedings Constitute Sufficient Cause for Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree.

The appellant, Shri K. Raja, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against an order d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree in Recovery Suit — Sets Aside Order Rejecting Application Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC. Failure to Serve Summons Properly and Lack of Knowledge of Proceedings Constitute Sufficient Cause for Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree.

The appellant, Shri K. Raja, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against an order d...