Search Results for "Development Control Regulation"

1543 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1543 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Heard PIL Challenging Development Permissions for Star Hotel in No Development Zone. The Court Considered Whether UDD Approval Under Regulation 59(3) and Additional FSI of 1.0 Were Valid Under DCRs and MRTP Act.

The case arose from a public interest litigation filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Challenge to DCR 33(7) Surplus Area Surrender for Cessed Building Rehabilitation. Petitioners Contended Compulsory Acquisition Without Adequate Compensation.

The group of writ petitions before the Bombay High Court challenged the constitutional validity of clause 4 of Appendix III to Regulation 33(7) of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging MCZMA's Refusal of CRZ Clearance for Occupancy Certificate. MCZMA cannot refuse clearance on ground of mismatch between DCR 1991 and DCR 1967 when construction was lawfully permitted under DCR 1991.

The petitioner, MRK Enterprises, a partnership firm, owned a property known as 'Amir House' at Colaba, Mumbai. The petitioner sought a Coastal Zone Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rule M-3 of DCPR for Satara Region as Ultra Vires. Rule requiring 12m wide access road for plot subdivision is a valid development control regulation under MRTP Act, 1966 and does not amount to uncompensated acquisition.

The petitioners, Suhas Shridhar Shahane and Subhash Kondiram Sawant, landowners in Satara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Considers Petitions Against Infrastructure Cost Levies by Nagpur Metropolitan Regional Development Authority. The Petitions Raise Constitutional and Statutory Challenges Under Articles 14, 265 and the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966.

The dispute arose from demands for infrastructure cost and STP charges made by the Nagpur Metropolitan Regional Development Authority (NMRDA) against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Decides Surviving Issue on Interpretation of Government Notification in Land Reservation Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Lessee Entitled to Non-Cash Compensation Under 2004 Notification for Release of Reserved Land for Development.

The writ petition was filed by Mafatlal Industries Limited and its officer seeking directions to enforce a Government Notification dated 10-02-2004 th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Public Parking Lot and FSI Computation in Mumbai Building Project. The Court held that construction of public parking lot above plinth level without valid commencement certificate was illegal, and remanded FSI computation issues for fresh consideration.

The case involves a dispute over the construction of a residential building and a public parking lot (PPL) by Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Ltd. (SRU...