Search Results for "Deficit Court Fees"

392 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 392 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Municipal Corporation in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Upholds Reference Court's Award of Rs.5 Lakh for Sewerage Treatment Plant Land. Claimants' Restricted Claim Due to Financial Constraints Does Not Bar Higher Compensation if Justified by Potential Value.

The Deputy Director Town Planning of Amravati Municipal Corporation appealed against the judgment of the Reference Court in L.A.C. No.215/2003, which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation Cannot Override Statutory Acquisition Process. Industrial Development Constitutes Valid Public Purpose Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the Uttarakhand High Court dated 02.11.2018, which dismissed the appeals filed by the appellants (the Stat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Despite Restricted Claim Amount. Tribunal Must Award Just Compensation Even if Claim is Restricted, Subject to Payment of Deficit Court Fee Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellants, legal representatives of the deceased Omprakash Lohakare, filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rules Against Stamp Duty on Amalgamation Orders Under Companies Act, 1956. Court Order Sanctioning Scheme of Amalgamation Is Not a Conveyance Under Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.

The case involved a reference under the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958, arising from a scheme of amalgamation between Reliance Industries Limited (transferee)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Suit for Specific Performance After Trial Commenced — Amendment Sought After Cross-Examination of Plaintiff's Witness Held Not Barred by Proviso to Order VI Rule 17 CPC as Trial Had Not Concluded and Amendment Was Necessary for Determining Real Controversy

The petitioner, Walchandnagar Industries Limited, the original defendant No.1, challenged an order dated 28-11-2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint for Non-Payment of Court Fees in Commercial Suit. Court upholds trial court's order rejecting plaint under Order VII Rule 11(c) CPC for failure to pay deficit court fees within extended time.

The appellant, Nine Media & Information Services Ltd., filed a commercial suit against multiple respondents including Hero Honda Motors Ltd. and other...