Search Results for "Debt Recovery Tribunal"

587 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 587 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Allows Section 7 Petition in Insolvency Case Due to Acknowledgment of Debt in Balance Sheets and Emails. Repeated acknowledgment of debt by Corporate Debtor in balance sheets and emails extends limitation period under Section 18 of Limitation Act, 1963, saving the petition from being time-barred.

The case involves an appeal filed by Akzo Nobel India Ltd. (Financial Creditor) against Stan Cars Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate Debtor) under Section 61 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditor's Appeal in Customs Duty Priority Dispute Over Wound-Up Company's Hypothecated Goods. Held that customs authorities do not have priority over secured creditors under Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956 for sale of warehoused goods under Customs Act, 1962.

The appeal by Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI) challenged the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court which held that customs authorities...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Suspended Director Against Admission of Insolvency Petition by Canara Bank Under Section 7 of IBC. Held that a suspended director has no locus standi to challenge the admission of a Section 7 application as the corporate debtor is the proper party.

The case involves an appeal by M. Suresh Kumar Reddy, claiming to be a suspended director of M/s Kranthi Edifice Pvt. Ltd. (corporate debtor), against...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition by Deutsche Bank Against Finolex Industries Under Section 433(e) Companies Act, 1956 — Disputed Derivative Transaction Debt Precludes Summary Winding-Up. Court Holds That Winding-Up Petition Is Not a Debt Recovery Mechanism and Dismisses Petition with Costs.

The judgment arises from a Company Petition filed by Deutsche Bank AG, Mumbai Branch, seeking winding-up of Finolex Industries Limited under Section 4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute Between State of Maharashtra and Developer. Court Holds That Existence of Arbitration Clause and Failure of Respondent to Appoint Arbitrator Justifies Appointment Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The State of Maharashtra filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator to reso...