Search Results for "Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal"

357 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 357 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Suspended Director Against Admission of Insolvency Petition by Canara Bank Under Section 7 of IBC. Held that a suspended director has no locus standi to challenge the admission of a Section 7 application as the corporate debtor is the proper party.

The case involves an appeal by M. Suresh Kumar Reddy, claiming to be a suspended director of M/s Kranthi Edifice Pvt. Ltd. (corporate debtor), against...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Auction Sale Under SARFAESI Act — Petitioner Failed to Deposit 25% of Sale Price. Condition Precedent Under Rule 9(3) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 Not Fulfilled, and Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act Available.

The petitioner, an individual aged about 70 years, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Partnership Firm and Guarantors. SARFAESI Act Section 13(2) Notice Validly Issued Against Principal Borrower and Guarantors, and Section 17 Application Before DRT Is the Appropriate Remedy.

The petitioners, M/s. Otoklin Global Business (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Dhaval Dilip Jhaveri, filed a writ petition under Article 226 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in IBC Case: CIRP Not a Substitute for Execution of Civil Court Decree. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 — Section 7 — Financial Debt — Decree Holder Cannot Bypass Execution Process.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Appellants against the order of the NCLAT which had directed admission of a Section 7 petition under the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Recovery Officer's Confirmation of Private Sale. Court Holds That Once Sale Is Confirmed and Possession Delivered, Remedy Lies in Civil Suit for Damages, Not in Writ Jurisdiction Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India.

The petitioners, Shaikh Gulab Shaikh Ahmed and Ambadas Maruti Kale, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds 2020 Tribunal Rules with Modifications to Ensure Judicial Independence. Court directs changes to Search-cum-Selection Committee composition and member qualifications to align with constitutional principles.

The Supreme Court of India was called upon to decide the constitutional validity of the Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and other Authorities (Qualificat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Affirms Guarantor's Independent Liability Despite Resolution Plan. Guarantor's obligations remain intact; assets of subsidiaries excluded from holding company’s resolution plans, creditor rights upheld

The Supreme Court of India affirmed that the approval of a resolution plan for a corporate guarantor does not absolve the principal borrower of its li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Refund of Court Fees in DRT Proceedings When Main Petition Becomes Infructuous — Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 13. The Debt Recovery Tribunal has inherent power to order refund of court fees under Section 13 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 when the main petition is disposed of as infructuous.

The petitioners, Sri Narayana Murthy H M and Smt. Chandrakala R., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challe...