Search Results for "DRT interim relief"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "DRT interim relief"

88 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 88 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Allows Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Matter — Civil Court Suit Barred by Section 34 of SARFAESI Act. The court held that the borrower's suit challenging possession notice under SARFAESI Act was not maintainable as the remedy lies exclusively before the Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act.

3 Mar 2026

The State Bank of India (SBI) filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging an order dat...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Civil Revision Petition Against Trial Court's Failure to Consider Interim Injunction in SARFAESI Act Matter — Jurisdiction of Civil Court Barred Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

19 Feb 2026

The petitioners, Dr. Jaishith Jebakumar Manuel and Pon Manju Usha, filed a suit (O.S.No.118 of 2025) before the Principal District Munsif, Nagercoil, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside DRAT Pre-Deposit Condition in SARFAESI Appeal — Petitioner Granted Relief Without Pre-Deposit. The Court held that the DRAT's power to waive or reduce pre-deposit under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act is discretionary and must be exercised judiciously, and that the condition of depositing 25% of the debt amount was onerous and disproportionate.

1 Jul 2020

The petitioner, M/s. Sanjeevini Drug House, a proprietorship concern, had availed credit facilities from Kavery Grameena Bank (respondent No.1). Upon ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Rejection of Plaint Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC in Mortgage Dispute Between Flat Purchasers and Bank. The court held that a civil suit seeking declaration that a mortgage is not valid and for specific performance of an agreement to purchase flats is not barred under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act, as the reliefs are outside the jurisdiction of the DRT.

1 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court considered appeals against a common judgment of the Bombay High Court which had allowed notices of motion filed by Axis Bank Ltd. (r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Decree-Holder in Execution Proceedings, Setting Aside Dismissal as Time-Barred. The court held that filing chamber summons and other applications constituted steps in aid of execution, extending limitation under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

18 Oct 2016

The case involves an appeal by Pratap G. Somaiya (the appellant/decree-holder) against an order dismissing his execution application as time-barred. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Partnership Firm and Guarantors. SARFAESI Act Section 13(2) Notice Validly Issued Against Principal Borrower and Guarantors, and Section 17 Application Before DRT Is the Appropriate Remedy.

28 Jul 2016

The petitioners, M/s. Otoklin Global Business (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Dhaval Dilip Jhaveri, filed a writ petition under Article 226 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Magistrate to Implement SARFAESI Order for Bank Possession. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Bound to Execute Section 14 Order for Taking Physical Possession of Secured Assets with Police Assistance.

10 Jun 2011

The petitioner, Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, a banking company as defined in Clause 5 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, filed a criminal writ petit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Predeposit Condition for Appeal Against Interlocutory Order Under SARFAESI Act. Section 18(1) of SARFAESI Act, 2002 Requires Deposit of 50% of Debt for Any Appeal Under Section 17, Including Interlocutory Orders, and Appellate Tribunal May Reduce to 25%.

16 Nov 2010

The petitioners, M/s Vinay Container Services Pvt. Ltd. and its guarantors, challenged an order of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) which ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Scheme for Small Fixed Deposit Holders in Winding-Up Petition Against Lloyds Finance Ltd. — Court directs framing of scheme to repay small depositors instead of winding up the company, considering that winding up would leave no recovery for any creditor.

3 Feb 2005

The judgment arises from a winding-up petition filed by Shri Basant Lal Agarwal against M/s. Lloyds Finance Ltd. for recovery of Rs. 3,75,00,000 advan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Appointment of Receiver in Suit for Specific Performance — Appellant's Alienation of Property During Pendency of Suit Held Contumacious. Doctrine of Lis Pendens Under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Applied to Protect Plaintiffs' Rights.

30 Nov -0001

The appeal arose from an order appointing a Receiver over a property in a suit for specific performance and permanent injunction. The plaintiffs (resp...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)