Search Results for "Criminal Manual guidelines"

218 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 218 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Murder, Abduction, and Robbery Case — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Establish Conspiracy Under Section 120-B IPC Despite Lack of Direct Link Between Co-Accused.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Cyrone Rodrigues and Chandrakant Talwar & Pappu @ Appu against their conviction and sentencing by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Dismissal of Complaint Under Section 156(3) CrPC — Dispute Civil in Nature. Agreement for Sale Not Registered, Power of Attorney Revoked, No Criminal Intent Made Out.

The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in real estate, filed a criminal complaint under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Examines Writ Petition Filed by Complainant-Wife Challenging Rejection of Further Investigation in POCSO Case. Trial Court Had Dismissed Application Under Section 173(8) CrPC Citing Investigating Officer's Discretion and Time-Barred Grounds.

The petitioner, wife of the accused, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the CrPC c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reviews Death Sentence Reference in Gang Rape and Murder Case. Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence of Last Seen Together and Forcible Abduction from House of Victim's Uncle.

The matter arises from a reference made by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for confi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Dacoity Case Due to Lack of Identification and Recovery — State fails to prove guilt under Sections 395 and 397 IPC as witnesses could not identify accused and no stolen property recovered.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 16.02.2004 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kelapur, in Sessions Trial...