Search Results for "Copyright Act, 1957"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Copyright Act, 1957"

126 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 126 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Plaintiff Fails to Establish Prima Facie Case and Guilty of Iniquitous Conduct. The court upheld the Single Judge's refusal of interim injunction under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Copyright Act, 1957, finding suppression of facts and lack of evidence of ownership.

6 Apr 2026

The present Commercial Appeal was filed by Laser Shaving India Pvt Ltd (the original plaintiff) against the order dated 25/06/2025 passed by the learn...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Interim Order Modifying Copyright Rules in Statutory License Dispute - Interim Order That Altered Prior Notice Requirement Under Rule 29(4) of Copyright Rules 2013 Set Aside as Impermissible Judicial Rewriting of Statutory Provisions.

27 Sep 2021

The appeals arose from an interim order dated 2 August 2021 by a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in writ petitions challengin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Copyright Infringement Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Copying. The court held that mere similarity in compilation of questions does not constitute infringement under Sections 63 and 65 of Copyright Act, 1957, and no dishonest intention for cheating under Section 420 IPC was made out.

25 Sep 2018

The applicants (Maroti Kamlapure, Vitthal Bayas, and Chaya Shinde) filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Restrains Defendant from Using Similar Trademark in Instant Adhesive Case. Affirms Likelihood of Confusion Between 'FEVIKWIK' and 'KWIKHEAL' Based on Overall Similarity of Marks and Trade Dress.

2 Aug 2017

The plaintiff, Pidilite Industries Limited, a leading manufacturer of adhesives and sealants, filed a suit against Poma-Ex Products and others for tra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Copyright Infringement Suit Against Film 'Baaghi' — No Substantial Similarity Found Between Plaintiffs' and Defendants' Works. The court held that similarities were at the level of general ideas, not protectable expression under the Copyright Act, 1957.

21 Apr 2016

The Plaintiffs, XYZ Films LLC, PT Merantau Films, and Sikhya Entertainment Private Limited, filed a copyright infringement suit against UTV Motion Pic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 8 Application to Refer Copyright Dispute to Arbitration — Term Sheet Contains Valid Arbitration Agreement. The Court held that the arbitration agreement in the Term Sheet dated 13th June 2012 is valid and referred the disputes between the Plaintiff and Defendant No. 1 to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

12 Apr 2016

The Plaintiff, Eros International Media Limited, filed a copyright infringement suit against Telemax Links India Pvt. Ltd. and other defendants, alleg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Release of Film in Breach of Confidence Action. Screenplay Disclosed in Confidence Used Without Consent Constitutes Breach of Confidence.

19 May 2015

The suit is a breach of confidence action, also alleging infringement of copyright. The 1st Plaintiff, a film and screen writer, conceptualized a stor...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petitions Against Re-Assessment Order Under KVAT Act on Software Implementation Services and Sales Tax. The Assessee Challenged a Demand of Rs.49 Crore and Sought Declarations of Unconstitutionality for Sections of KVAT Act and Finance Act, 1994, but Constitutional Arguments Were Not Pressed Before the Court.

9 Feb 2015

The assessee, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, was engaged in development and sale of software, including Finacle universal banki...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Suits in Trademark Dispute from Kopargaon to Nagpur for Convenience of Parties and Witnesses. The court held that the balance of convenience favors transfer under Section 24 CPC where all parties and witnesses are based in Nagpur and the subject matter is connected to Nagpur.

7 May 2013

The judgment concerns two Misc. Civil Applications filed by Nagpur Distillers Pvt. Ltd. and Vidarbha Distillers seeking transfer of three suits (Suit ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Declares Plaintiff Owner of Copyright in Drawings Developed Under Contract for Valuable Consideration. Payment of Rs.2,87,500/- for Development of Drug Powder Inhaler Transfers Copyright Ownership Under Section 17 of Copyright Act, 1957.

24 Feb 2005

The plaintiff, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited, a pharmaceutical company, sought to develop a Drug Powder Inhaler (DPI) device for asthma medications...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)