Search Results for "Contradictory Clauses"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Contradictory Clauses"

243 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 243 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows IRCTC's Appeals in Catering Contract Dispute, Restricts Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view over arbitrator's findings on tariff revision.

7 Nov 2025

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. (IRCTC) and other parties, setting aside the Delh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Chief Minister's Stay on Co-operative Bank Recruitment — Chief Minister Lacks Statutory Power Under MCS Act to Interfere in Autonomous Bank's Internal Management.

3 Mar 2023

The petitioners, Chandrapur District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. and its Chairman, challenged the order dated 29.11.2022 passed by the Chief Minist...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Direction to Provide Arbitration in Expired Toll Collection Contracts. Clause 36 of Agreement Held Not an Arbitration Agreement; Court Cannot Direct Parties to Arbitrate Under Article 226.

6 Nov 2020

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by M/s. MEP RGSL Toll Bridge Pvt. Ltd. and Raima Toll & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., both specia...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Council of Architecture's Authority Over AICTE in Architectural Education Matters — Conflict Between Two Regulatory Bodies Resolved in Favor of Special Statute. The Court held that the Architects Act, 1972, being a special statute, prevails over the general AICTE Act, 1987, in matters of approval and regulation of architectural institutions.

8 Nov 2019

The case involves a conflict between two regulatory bodies: the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) and the Council of Architecture (CoA...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. Award declared firm dissolved on a date not claimed by any party and failed to consider crucial evidence regarding partnership property.

5 Jun 2017

The Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenges an arbitral award dated 1st August 2006. The petiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Blacklisting Order Against Contractor in ONGC Contract Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice as Show Cause Notice Did Not Specify Proposed Penalty. Show Cause Notice Must Clearly Indicate Intended Action of Blacklisting to Afford Meaningful Opportunity of Hearing Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

2 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Anchor Offshore Services Ltd (Anchor), a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged a blacklisting order dated 5th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petitions by Cab Company Against Drivers, Appoints Sole Arbitrator. Arbitration clause in Driver Agreement survives termination under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

29 Oct 2015

The petitioner, Meru Cab Company Private Limited, filed four arbitration petitions under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, see...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Government Resolution Requiring Prior Approval for Fee Hikes in Unaided Private Schools. The court held that the requirement of prior approval for fee increases under the Maharashtra Educational Institutions (Prohibition of Capitation Fee) Act, 1987 is reasonable and does not violate Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

28 Apr 2015

The petitioners, Uran Education Society and Unaided Schools Forum, challenged the validity of a Government Resolution dated 5th May 2013 issued by the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation Between Casby CFS Pvt. Ltd. and Casby Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Under Section 394 of Companies Act, 1956 — Restructuring of Casby Group Approved. Court found the scheme fair, reasonable, and not contrary to public interest, with no objections from Regional Director.

19 Mar 2015

The judgment concerns a petition filed by Casby CFS Pvt. Ltd. (Transferor) and Casby Logistics Pvt. Ltd. (Transferee) seeking sanction of a scheme of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Scrutiny Committee's Rejection of Thakur Tribe Claim. Court upholds committee's finding that petitioner failed to prove he belongs to Thakur Scheduled Tribe due to lack of documentary evidence and contradictory entries.

20 Jan 2006

The petitioner, Rajendra Ramrao Ghosalkar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated May 19, 200...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)