Search Results for "Consumer Protection Act"

85 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 85 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in Consumer Protection Case Due to Absence of Deficiency in Service. Consumer Forums Cannot Adjudicate Highly Disputed Factual Issues or Allegations of Fraud Between Company Directors as Proceedings Are Summary in Nature Under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by the Managing Director of D-Cube Constructions (P) Ltd. against City Union Bank Limited, alleging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Consumer Complaint, Reducing Compensation for Deficiency in Hair Styling Services. Deficiency in Service Upheld as Factual Finding, but Compensation of Rs.2 Crores Set Aside as Excessive and Unsupported by Evidence Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appeal arose from an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in a consumer complaint filed by the respondent against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Consumer Complaint Against Builder for Refund of Consideration Due to Premature Filing and Lack of Deficiency Proof. Complaint Filed Before Expiry of Contractual Grace Period Under Allotment Terms, and Appellants Failed to Establish Incomplete Work or Delay in Possession Offer.

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by the appellants against the respondent-company, a builder, alleging deficiency in service due to d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Consumer Appeal in Car Delivery Dispute, Restoring Lower Forum Orders. National Commission Exceeded Revisional Jurisdiction Under Section 21(b) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by Interfering with Concurrent Findings of Fact on Used Car Delivery.

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint where the appellant booked and paid the full sale consideration for a new Tata Victa GX TC car from the de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Telecom Company's Claim for Refund of Entry Fee After 2G Licences Quashed Due to Illegal Government Policy. Restitution Under Section 65 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Denied as Quashing Did Not Render Contracts Void, and Set-Off Policy Upheld Under Article 14 of Constitution.

The dispute involved a telecom company seeking a refund of an Entry Fee of Rs 1454.94 crores paid for 2G licences across twenty-one service areas, aft...