Search Results for "Concurrent User"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Concurrent User"

266 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 266 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Possession Suit — Concurrent Findings on Ownership and Limitation Upheld. Adverse Possession Plea Fails as Defendant Failed to Prove Hostile Possession for Statutory Period.

3 Nov 2025

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendant, Mrs. Anjanabai Rajaram Gore, challenging the concurrent judgments and decrees of th...

High Court

Madras High Court Rehears Interlocutory Applications in Trademark Dispute for Interim Injunction. Court Directed to Apply Trinity Tests and Consider Section 12-A Compliance and Order 2 Rule 2 Bar After Remand by Division Bench.

5 Feb 2025

The Madras High Court reheard two interlocutory applications in a commercial suit involving a trademark dispute over the 'Massey Ferguson' brand. Trac...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Decree Under Section 13(1)(k) of Bombay Rent Act. Concurrent Findings of Non-User of Suit Premises Upheld as Evidence Established Disuse for Continuous Six Months Without Reasonable Cause.

19 Aug 2005

The judgment arose from a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging concurrent eviction decrees passed by two courts be...

High Court

Madras High Court Adjudicates Cross-Petitions for Rectification of Trade Mark Register Under Sections 47, 57, and 125 of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Dispute Involves Competing Claims for Removal of Respective Registered Marks in Class 9.

20 Feb 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint and Grants Temporary Injunction in Property Dispute — Concurrent Orders of Courts Below Set Aside. Amendment Sought to Correct Description of Suit Property Held to Be Necessary for Effective Adjudication, and Prima Facie Case, Balance of Convenience, and Irreparable Injury Found in Favour of Plaintiff.

22 Jul 2021

The petitioner, M/s. Vaishnavi Sai Shri Mahalaxmi Jagdamba Shikshan Sanstha, filed two writ petitions challenging concurrent orders of the Small Cause...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — 'HAYWARDS 5000' v. 'COX 5001'. The court held that the Defendant's mark 'COX 5001' is deceptively similar to the Plaintiff's registered marks 'HAYWARDS 5000' and 'FIVE THOUSAND', constituting infringement under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and passing off under Section 135.

8 Dec 2025

The Plaintiff, Anheuser Busch Inbev India Ltd., filed a commercial suit seeking a permanent injunction restraining the Defendant, Jagpin Brewerise Lim...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds IPAB Order Expunging Trademark 'Creative' for Deceptive Similarity in Travel Services. Petitioner's mark 'Creative Tours & Travels' held deceptively similar to respondent's registered mark 'Creative Travel', causing confusion among consumers under Section 9(2)(a) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

4 May 2016

The petitioner, Creative Tours & Travels (India) Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute Involving Succession and Adverse Possession. Court upholds concurrent findings that appellant failed to prove title or adverse possession over suit property.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a second appeal filed by the legal heirs of the original plaintiff, Custodio Gama, against the judgment and decree of the District C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Cannot Be Interfered With Under Section 115 CPC. The court held that the revisional court cannot re-appreciate evidence or substitute its own findings when the lower courts have concurrently found that the plaintiff failed to prove title and possession.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a civil revision application arising from a suit for declaration of title and possession. The plaintiff claimed ownership of a prope...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Possession Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Limitation and Adverse Possession. Court holds that mere possession for 12 years does not automatically bar the suit unless the defendant proves adverse possession against the true owner, and the plaintiff's suit filed within 12 years of knowledge of encroachment is within limitation.

3 Nov 2025

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendant, Mrs. Anjanabai Rajaram Gore, challenging the concurrent judgments and decrees of th...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)