Search Results for "Companies Act 1956 Section 111"

118 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 118 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition in Property Dispute Between Near Relations — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Adverse Possession Claim Fails as Petitioner Failed to Prove Hostile Possession and Ouster of True Owner.

The dispute pertained to a property tussle between near relations. The petitioner, M/s Jwel Buildcon Pvt. Ltd., claimed title by adverse possession ov...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Entertainment Duty on Amusement Park Admission Fee. Lumpsum Charge for Entry and Entertainment is Subject to Duty Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923.

The petitioners, Pan India Paryatan Limited and its director, owned and operated an amusement park in Greater Bombay which opened to the public on 25t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition in 50:50 Joint Venture Due to Availability of Buy-Out Remedy. Loss of mutual trust and confidence does not automatically justify winding up under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956 when one party is willing to purchase the other's shares.

The petitioner, Severn Trent Water Purification Inc, filed a winding up petition under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956 against Capital Contr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Waqf Tribunal Order, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Waqf Property. Court holds that Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain suit regarding waqf property in view of Section 85 of the Maharashtra Waqf Act, 1995.

The applicant, Linker Shelter Pvt. Ltd., filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the or...