Search Results for "Combination Regulations"

123 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 123 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Licensing Conditions on Orchestra Bars Under Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. Gender-Based Numerical Restrictions on Performers Held Valid as Reasonable Restrictions in Public Interest Under Article 19(6) of the Constitution.

The appeals arose from a judgment of the High Court of Bombay that upheld conditions imposed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mumbai, on orchestr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Aadhaar Enrolment Fraud Case — No Prima Facie Case Made Out. Allegations of forgery and cheating under IPC Sections 465, 468, 469, 471, 420, 120-B read with 34 fail as complaint lacks specific details and essential ingredients.

The petitioner, Sri Naresh Kumar R.P., CEO of M/s Edurays India, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking qu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Slum Rehabilitation Authority's Declaration and Clearance Orders for Entire Area Including Undeclared Land. Prior Notification Under Section 4 of Maharashtra Slums Areas Act Not Required Before Proceedings Under Chapter I-A.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the occupants (appellants) challenging the declaration of 5168.50 sq. mts. in Survey Nos. 27 and 28 at...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Petitioners in Food Adulteration Case — No Offence Made Out Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Sale of 'Mint' and 'Saunf' Products Not Prohibited Under Section 26(2)(i) of FSS Act, 2006 as They Are Not 'Food' as Defined.

The petitioners, Anand Ramdhani Chaurasia and Vijay Banarasi Chaurasia, were engaged in the business of selling 'Mint' and 'Saunf' products. On 12th J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Disposes of Appeals by Authority for Advance Rulings Against High Court Judgment Quashing AAR's Rejection of Treaty Benefits. Questions Raised on Taxation of Capital Gains Under India-Mauritius DTAA and Scope of Section 245R(2) Proviso (iii) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The disputes arose from applications for advance ruling filed by three Mauritius-incorporated companies—Tiger Global International II Holdings, Tige...