Search Results for "Coal India Limited"

700 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 700 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.

The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification. Petitioners Alleged Notification Ultra Vires Article 246 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, Seeking to Quash Demand Notices.

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, corporations, and individuals, including National ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Coal Supply Dispute — No Ground for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Court upholds award of damages for short supply of coal, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by Mahaguj Collieries Ltd. (original respondent) challenging an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petition in Minimum Wages Act Dispute Over Reimbursement of Labour Costs. Contractor Seeks Revision of Contract Rates After Notification Increased Minimum Wages for Sweeping and Cleaning Employment.

Background: The petitioner, A2Z Infraservices Limited, a company engaged in providing mechanized cleaning and housekeeping services, entered into thre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Leave Encashment Withheld by Employer After Superannuation. Withholding of leave encashment on ground of pending departmental inquiry is impermissible as leave encashment is a vested right and not a gratuity or pension.

The petitioner, Pradip Kumar Roy, was appointed as a Junior Executive Trainee in CMPDI, Ranchi on 01/07/1981 and later transferred to the respondent-C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Imposition of Maximum Interest Rate on Delayed Royalty Payment Under Mineral Concession Rules, 1960. Court Holds That Rule 64-A Prescribes Maximum Rate, Not Mandatory Rate, and Respondents Have Discretion to Impose Lower Interest.

The petitioner, Associated Cement Companies Limited, filed a writ petition challenging a communication dated 16/18.4.1996 from the respondents demandi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Challenge to Royalty Rules Under MMDR Act. Petitioners Argue Notification and Amended Rule 64D Exceed Section 9(3) Powers.

These writ petitions arose out of challenges by various mining leaseholders in Goa to the notification dated 13 August 2009, the amendment to Rule 64D...