Search Results for "Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958"

205 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 205 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Order Quashing No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. Service of Notice on Adult Member of Family Under No Confidence Motion Rules, 1975, Held Sufficient Despite Meeting Rules Requirement of Service on Male Member.

The petitioners, members of Village Panchayat Futana, challenged an order of the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad, which had allowed an appeal by r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Amendment Introducing Multi-Member Wards and Multiple Votes in Municipal Elections — Amendment to Section 5 of BPMC Act and Section 10 of MMC Act Valid as Intra Vires the Constitution.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Vinayak Bhiva Bhilare and Miss. Vaishali Chandane challenging Act No. XXVI of 2011, which amended Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Members for Leasing Room to Anganwadi — No Disqualification Under Section 14(f) and (g) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act as Lease Was Prior to Election and Not by Members.

The petitioners, Shyam Madhavrao Mohod and Sau. Supriya Shyam Mohod, were elected as members of the Gram Panchayat, Sindhi (Meghe) in 2014, and petiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Decides Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Sarpanch for Alleged Encroachment under Section 14(1)(j3) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958

The petitioner, Sau. Sandhya Hemant Salunke, was elected as a member of Walwadi Gram Panchayat in 2010 and subsequently as Sarpanch. Respondents 5 and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Grampanchyat Member Under Section 14(1)(j-3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Court holds that encroachment by father-in-law or husband does not disqualify the elected member unless she herself is the encroacher.

The petitioner, Gorakh Baban Zende, a voter from Chikhali village, filed a dispute before the Collector seeking disqualification of respondent No.1, V...