High Court of Bombay Decides Writ Petition No. 1811 of 2019 Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The specific outcome and legal findings are not disclosed in the provided judgment excerpt.
15 Apr 2025...
202 result(s) found
The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...
The Appellant, Kavis Fashions Private Limited, challenged an order dated 4 January 2021 passed by the Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Thane, allowi...
The petitioner, Anwar Noormohammed Pirani, filed a suit for possession and recovery of rent against the respondent, Santosh Gajanan Naskulwar, in resp...
The petitioner, Prakash Arun Apte, proprietor of M/s A.V. Apte & Company, challenged an order dated 28 August 2014 passed by the Competent Authority a...
The Khadi and Village Industries Commission (KVIC), a statutory body, was a monthly tenant of a godown premises in Mumbai owned by the respondents (la...
The petitioner, Manhar Auto Stores, a partnership concern, was a tenant in a shop premises owned by Dr. Hansrajbhai Shah, who executed a registered Wi...
The petitioner, M/s. Ramchand Onkarlal Agarwal, a bidi manufacturer in Kamptee, Nagpur, challenged the applicability of the Employees' State Insurance...
The petitioner, Askay & Co Pvt Ltd, was a tenant of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) in premises at Great Social Building, Bombay, since ...
The petitioner, Nusli Neville Wadia, was a lawful monthly tenant of Flat No.B/27 at Mayfair Gardens, Malabar Hill, Mumbai, since 1 October 1972, payin...
