Search Results for "Bombay Municipal Corporation Pension Rules"

136 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 136 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Without Notice Under MRTP Act and MC Act. Court holds that demolition without prior notice under Section 53 of MRTP Act and Section 260 of MC Act violates principles of natural justice.

The petitioners, residents of Thane and Nashik, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Municipal Employee Before Age 58 — Violation of Service Regulations. Compulsory retirement at age 55 without following Regulation 25(3) of BMC Service Regulations, 1989 set aside as arbitrary and illegal.

The Petitioner, Smt. Yashoda Bapu Jadhav, was an employee of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (BMC). She was compulsorily retired at the ag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Retired Civil Servant's Writ Petition Challenging Tribunal Order — No Entitlement to Difference in Pension Without Proper Claim. Petitioner failed to establish any legal right to differential pension under Karnataka Municipal Administration Service Rules.

The petitioner, Sadashivappa, a retired civil servant from the Karnataka Municipal Administration Service, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tata Memorial Centre's Petitions Challenging Industrial Court's Finding on Appropriate Government. State Government Held as Appropriate Government for Autonomous Body Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971, Making Union's Complaint Maintainable.

The Bombay High Court dismissed four writ petitions filed by Tata Memorial Centre (TMC) challenging decisions of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, which h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Section 9A of Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act Requiring Caste Validity Certificate for Councillors. Provision Held Valid as It Is a Reasonable Classification to Prevent Fraud on Reservation and Does Not Violate Articles 14 and 243T.

The petitioners, elected councillors of Jalna Municipal Council from reserved categories, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 9A of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Property Tax Reassessment by Municipal Corporation. Reassessment of property tax under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 must be based on capital value and cannot be arbitrary.

The petitioner, Jagjeevan Jaikumar Sanghai (since deceased, through legal heirs), filed a writ petition challenging the reassessment of property tax b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee's Petition for Pensionary Benefits with Interest. Delay in Payment of Pension by Municipal Corporation Entitles Employee to Interest at 6% Per Annum from Date of Retirement.

The petitioner, Dr. Dinkar Sadashivrao Deshpande, a retired employee of the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation, filed a writ petition seeking a directio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Absorption of Grampanchayat Employees as Clerks in Municipal Corporation — Directions Issued for Regularisation of Service. Employees of merged Grampanchayats entitled to absorption in Nanded Waghala Municipal Corporation with continuity of service and pay protection.

The petitioners were employees of Grampanchayats Taroda (Kh.) and Taroda (Bk.), which were merged into the Nanded Waghala Municipal Corporation. They ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Implementation of 5th Pay Commission Recommendations for Municipal Primary School Staff. Held that the recommendations are not binding on the Municipal Corporation and the petitioners have no vested right to claim such implementation.

The petitioners, two associations registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, claiming to represent teaching and non-teaching staff employed i...