Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee's Petition for Pensionary Benefits with Interest. Delay in Payment of Pension by Municipal Corporation Entitles Employee to Interest at 6% Per Annum from Date of Retirement.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Dr. Dinkar Sadashivrao Deshpande, a retired employee of the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Corporation to release his pensionary benefits with interest for the delay in payment. The petitioner retired on attaining the age of superannuation, but the Corporation delayed the payment of his pension and other retirement benefits without any justification. The petitioner approached the High Court by way of a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Corporation to release the benefits with interest. The Court heard the parties and considered the submissions. The Court observed that pension is not a bounty but a right of the employee, and any delay in payment without valid reason entitles the employee to interest. The Court directed the Corporation to release the pensionary benefits with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of retirement till the date of actual payment, within a period of two weeks. The petition was allowed in part.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Pensionary Benefits - Delay in Payment - Interest - The petitioner, a retired employee of the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation, sought direction for release of pensionary benefits with interest for delay in payment. The Court held that pension is not a bounty but a right, and delay in payment without justification entitles the employee to interest. The Corporation was directed to pay the benefits with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of retirement till actual payment. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to pensionary benefits with interest for the delay caused by the respondent Corporation in releasing the same

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed in part. The respondent No.2 Corporation is directed to release the pensionary benefits with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of retirement till the date of actual payment, within a period of two weeks.

Law Points

  • Pension is not a bounty but a right
  • delay in payment of pensionary benefits entitles employee to interest
  • mandamus can be issued for enforcement of fundamental rights
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (07) 20

Writ Petition No.10010 of 2014

2016-07-19

S.S. Shinde, Sangitrao S. Patil

Mr. Pradeep Deshmukh holding for Mr. Y.P. Deshmukh for petitioner, Mr. A.V. Deshmukh, AGP for respondent no.1, Mr. S.B. Deshpande for respondent no.2

Dr. Dinkar s/o. Sadashivrao Deshpande

The State of Maharashtra, Aurangabad Municipal Corporation

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking direction to release pensionary benefits with interest for delay

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought writ of mandamus directing respondent No.2 Corporation to release pensionary benefits with interest for causing delay in making payment

Filing Reason

Delay in payment of pensionary benefits after retirement

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to pensionary benefits with interest for the delay caused by the respondent Corporation in releasing the same

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that pension is a right and delay in payment entitles interest Respondent Corporation did not justify the delay

Ratio Decidendi

Pension is not a bounty but a right of the employee. Delay in payment of pensionary benefits without justification entitles the employee to interest. The court can issue a writ of mandamus to enforce such right.

Judgment Excerpts

Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith, and heard finally with the consent of the parties. This Petition is filed with the following prayers: B) By issue of writ of mandamus or any other writ of like nature, the respondent No.2 Corporation be directed to release the pensionary benefits with interest for causing delay in making payment of the same within period of two weeks

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No.10010 of 2014 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad. The petition was reserved on 01.07.2016 and pronounced on 19.07.2016.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee's Petition for Pensionary Benefits with Interest. Delay in Payment of Pension by Municipal Corporation Entitles Employee to Interest at 6% Per Annum from Date of Retirement.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Prima Facie Adjustment Under Section 143(1)(a) Cannot Include Provision for Doubtful Debt. The ITAT was right in holding that adjustment for provision for doubtful debt is ...