Search Results for "Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946"

122 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 122 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Strikes Down Caste-Based Discrimination in Prison Manuals as Unconstitutional. Prison Rules Dividing Labour and Segregating Barracks by Caste Violate Articles 14, 15, 17, 21, and 23 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Sukanya Shantha, a journalist, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions for the repeal of offendi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Industrial Court Award Granting Wage Hike to Workmen Under Section 73(2) of MIR Act. Industrial Court's Findings on Comparable Units and Financial Capacity Upheld as Not Perverse.

The petitioner, M/s Diffusion Engineering Limited, a public limited company operating four manufacturing units, challenged an award dated 15-2-2019 pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Writ Petition of Hindustan Unilever Against Industrial Court's Stay of Domestic Enquiry. Employee Granted Right to Engage Lawyer in Enquiry When Employer's Representative is Legally Trained Under Model Standing Orders.

The petitioner, Hindustan Unilever Limited, challenged an order dated 24/10/2017 passed by the Industrial Court, Akola, in a complaint filed by respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Industrial Court Remand Order in MRTU & PULP Act Case — Maintainability of Complaint Must Be Decided on Merits Without Remand. Relationship of Employer-Employee Must Be Admitted or Undisputed for Complaint Under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act to Be Maintainable.

The petitioners, employees of the Forest Department, filed Complaint (ULP) 13/2010 before the Labour Court, Yavatmal, alleging unfair labour practices...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Elected Representatives Under BIR Act Have Locus Standi to File Complaint Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, M/s. Neco Schubert and Salzer Ltd., an employer, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 9 January 2004 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by ICAR and NRCC, Upholds State Government as Appropriate Government for Labour Dispute. Jurisdiction of Labour Court under MRTU & PULP Act Confirmed for Termination of Agricultural Labourers Employed by Central Government Undertaking.

The case involves an appeal by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and the National Research Centre for Citrus (NRCC) against a judgmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Transfer Orders of Bank Employees — Transfer Policy Not Violative of Service Conditions. Employer's Right to Transfer Upheld as Incident of Service.

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by employees of the Chandrapur District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. challenging their transfer ...