Search Results for "Bombay Cotton Contracts Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Bombay Cotton Contracts Act"

76 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 76 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MSME to Claim VSV Scheme Benefits Despite Reclassification as 'Not an MSME' — Legal Fiction Under Clause 8(5) Notification Extends Non-Tax Benefits for Three Years. The Court held that the Petitioner, re-classified as 'not an MSME' on 9th May 2023, is entitled to the benefit of Clause 8(5) of Notification S.O. 2119(E) dated 26th June 2020 (as substituted on 18th October 2022), which deems it to be a Medium Enterprise for non-tax benefits for three years, and thus eligible for the VSV Scheme.

13 Aug 2024

The Petitioner, Marine Electricals India Ltd., is a company engaged in electronic automation, information, communication, and technical solutions, and...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Preliminary Decree. Court holds that a suit for partition is not barred by limitation when the plaintiff is in joint possession and that a co-owner can alienate only his share, not the entire property.

24 Aug 2023

The case involves a partition suit filed by the appellants (plaintiffs) seeking partition and separate possession of their share in the joint family p...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Partition and Separate Possession. Court holds that a co-owner in possession of joint family property cannot claim adverse possession against other co-owners unless there is ouster or denial of title.

24 Aug 2023

The case involves a partition suit filed by the respondents (plaintiffs) seeking partition and separate possession of joint family properties. The app...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Charter Party Dispute Over Detention Charges. Arbitration agreement held valid and arbitrable despite respondent's objections regarding limitation and non-signing of charter party.

28 Jul 2023

The applicant, Alliance Import and Export, a partnership firm, filed two arbitration applications under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeals in Part in Income Tax Dispute Involving Disallowances Under Section 14A, Section 37, and Section 10B. The court held that Section 14A disallowance requires satisfaction of AO, scientific research expenditure not allowable, demurrage is business expenditure, and Section 10B deduction remanded.

7 May 2021

The case involves appeals by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which had partly allowed the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by MIDC in Contract Breach Case — No Binding Contract Without Work Order. Mere acceptance of tender does not create contractual obligations; formal work order essential under tender conditions.

11 Feb 2021

The case involves an appeal by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) against a decree passed in Special Civil Suit No.99/2009, whe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Removal of Assets in Commercial Suit Despite Arbitration Clause — Interim Relief Granted Under Order 39 CPC. Trial Court Directed to Decide Interim Application on Merits Without Considering Maintainability Based on Arbitration Clause.

7 Aug 2019

The petitioner, INOX Leisure Limited, filed a commercial suit against Indo Pacific Projects Limited seeking recovery of security deposit and permissio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds CGIT Award Holding Canteen Contract as Sham and Bogus, Directs Absorption of Canteen Workers as Direct Employees of Principal Employer. Contract Labour Arrangement Found to Be a Mere Facade with Principal Employer Exercising Complete Control Over Workers, Making Them Direct Employees Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

26 Jul 2016

The petitioner, The Shipping Corporation of India Ltd., a public company, challenged an award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.1 (CGIT...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Eviction Suit for Unauthorized Subletting. Concurrent findings of fact that tenant sublet premises without landlord's consent under Section 15 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, upheld.

8 Mar 2013

The Khadi and Village Industries Commission (KVIC), a statutory body, was a monthly tenant of a godown premises in Mumbai owned by the respondents (la...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Reference of Industrial Dispute for Adjudication — Reference Need Not Contain Detailed Facts, Only Dispute Must Be Identifiable. The Court held that an order of reference under Section 12(5) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is valid even if it does not contain the nature of dispute or facts and circumstances, as long as the dispute is identifiable from the reference.

21 Dec 2006

The petitioner, M/s. Lokmat Newspapers Pvt. Ltd., challenged the order dated 3/4/2006 passed by the Industrial Court/Tribunal, Nagpur in Reference No....

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)