Madras High Court Delivers Common Judgment in Land Record Disputes. The Court Considers the Validity of Orders Passed by Revenue Authorities Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
20 Mar 2025...
Search Results for "Belated challenge"
714 result(s) found
Found 714 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Unreliable Victim Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(2)(g), 366A, 292, 500, 506(II) IPC and Section 67 IT Act Set Aside.
10 Oct 2024The case involves two appeals against conviction for gang rape and other offences. The prosecution alleged that on 16 May 2011, the appellants and thr...
- 480
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Assignee's Challenge to Auction Sale for Non-Compliance with Regulation 37(1) of DRT Regulations, 2015 — Failure to Raise Objection at Appropriate Stage and Lack of Prejudice Renders Challenge Belated and Unsubstantiated.
8 Aug 2024The petitioner, Invest Assets Securitisations & Reconstruction Private Limited, an assignee holding a pari passu charge with the first respondent Bank...
- 448
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Tender Conditions as Misconceived. Tender conditions requiring prior experience and financial capacity are valid and not arbitrary.
30 Apr 2024The petitioners, four private limited companies engaged in infrastructure development, filed a writ petition challenging the terms of a tender floated...
- 22
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Landowners' Challenge to Acquisition for Industrial Development — Petitioners Failed to Prove Lapse Under Section 24(2) of LARR Act, 2013. Compensation Tendered and Possession Taken by MIDC, Acquisition Did Not Lapse.
23 Dec 2022The petitioners, Ramesh Bapurao Nikhade and Dilipkumar Bapurao Nikhade, along with the legal representatives of Bapurao Dasruji Nikhade, filed writ pe...
High Court
Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Helicopter Charter Dispute, Rejects Public Policy and Unjust Enrichment Challenges. Award directing payment of USD 6,563,700 and SGD 775,462.28 upheld as not contrary to Indian public policy under Section 48 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
17 Feb 2022The petitioner, Aircon Beibars FZE, a UAE company engaged in aircraft leasing, and the respondent, Heligo Charters Private Limited, an Indian helicopt...
- 27
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes COFEPOSA Detention Order at Pre-Execution Stage Due to Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Exercise of Power. Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Relevant Material and Grounds of Detention Were Vague and Stale.
19 Jun 2021The petitioner, Karnaram Lumbaji Choudhary, challenged a detention order dated 8th March 2018 passed by the Joint Secretary, Government of India, unde...
- 33
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Damages and Interest Order Against Educational Institution in EPF Case Due to Lack of Mens Rea and Non-Application of Mind. The court held that imposition of damages under Section 14B of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 requires consideration of the employer's fault, and the authority must apply its mind to the explanation offered.
11 Jun 2015The petitioners, Shree Hanuman Vyayam Prasarak Mandal and the Principal Vidarbha Ayurved Mahavidyalaya, challenged an order dated 29.11.2005 passed by...
- 141
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order Quashing Charge Memo Due to Delay and Quasi-Judicial Functions. The Court Held That Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated After 8 Years for Acts Done in Discharge of Official Duties as Income Tax Officer Were Unjustified and Caused Prejudice to the Employee.
13 Feb 2013The Union of India and others filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Central Admini...
- 88
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Advertising Contract Dispute — Petitioner's Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Fails. Court Held That Arbitrator's Findings on Breach and Quantum Were Not Patently Illegal or Against Public Policy.
8 Jan 2013The petitioner, M/s Maneesh Pharmaceuticals Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an ar...
- 98
