Search Results for "Bar and Restaurant"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Bar and Restaurant"

196 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 196 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Cancellation of Performance Licence for Restaurant and Bar Due to Repeated Violations of Public Amusement Rules. The court held that the Appellate Authority's order affirming cancellation of licence was justified as the petitioner failed to comply with licence conditions and rules, including unauthorized structural changes and indecent performances.

16 Apr 2026

The petitioner, M/s Hotel Sadguru Restaurant and Bar, through its proprietor Nagesh Padmappa Suvarna, challenged an order dated 13th February 2026 pas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Former Home Minister in PMLA Case — Twin Conditions Under Section 45 Not Satisfied. Applicant held entitled to bail as ED failed to demonstrate reasonable grounds for believing applicant guilty of money laundering under PMLA.

4 Oct 2022

The applicant, Anil Vasantrao Deshmukh, a former Home Minister of Maharashtra, filed a bail application under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Karnataka Excise Act Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Section 36 of Karnataka Excise Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove sale of liquor beyond reasonable doubt.

21 Nov 2019

The petitioner, Manoj Kumar, was convicted by the II JMFC, Mangaluru in C.C.No.781/2014 for an offence punishable under Section 36 of the Karnataka Ex...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Refers Questions on Applicability of Payment of Gratuity Act to Temples to Full Bench. Division Bench Finds Arguable Questions Whether Temple is 'Commercial Establishment' Under Karnataka Shops Act and Whether Prior Precedent on Temple Employee's Gratuity is Correct.

1 Aug 2019

The dispute arose when a former employee of Shri Mookambika Temple, Kollur, claimed gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 after his superan...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge to Levy of VAT on Liquor by Certain Licensees; Alleged Discrimination Between Different Categories of Excise Licence Holders. Petitioners Contend That Notification Exempting Some Dealers While Taxing Others Violates Articles 14, 19, and 304B of the Constitution.

30 Sep 2015

The writ petitions were filed by various licensees under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1967, challenging the constitutional validity of Entry No.59A of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlords' Petition for Eviction on Ground of Reasonable and Bona Fide Requirement — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Landlord's Own Witness Admitted No Need for Possession, Defeating Claim Under Rent Control Law.

21 Aug 2015

The petitioners, landlords of commercial premises in Kolhapur, filed a suit for eviction against the tenant on grounds of non-user, erection of perman...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Denial of Public Entertainment Licence for Restaurant with Valid FLIII Licence — Parking Requirement Not a Valid Ground Under Bombay Police Act, 1951. The Court held that the only precondition for Public Entertainment Licence under Rule 3 of the Public Entertainment Rules is possession of a liquor licence, and the Commissioner cannot impose additional conditions like parking.

22 Jan 2015

The petitioner, Rajeev S. Mehta, is the sole proprietor of M/s. Senorita Bar and Restaurant, which holds various licences including an Eating House Re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Restaurant Bar Challenging ESI Coverage Demand. Establishment Held Covered Under Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 as Per Inspection Report Showing More Than 10 Employees.

23 Jan 2014

The appellant, M/s. Omarkhayyam Bar & Restaurant, a partnership firm, challenged an order of the Employees' State Insurance Court, Nagpur, which uphel...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeals by BBMP and Health Officer Regarding Delegation of Quasi-Judicial Power to Cancel Trade Licences under Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976. The Health Officer's cancellation of restaurant trade licences for hookah service was quashed as ultra vires, the Commissioner's authority being quasi-judicial and not delegable under Section 66.

27 Feb 2013

The Bruhath Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) and its Health Officer filed writ appeals against a single judge's order that quashed the Health Office...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trade Name Dispute Over 'Bhagat Tarachand' — Plaintiff Establishes Prima Facie Case of Proprietorship and Likelihood of Confusion. The court restrained defendants from using the trade name 'Bhagat Tarachand' or any deceptively similar name in their restaurant business at Inorbit Mall, Vashi, pending suit.

25 Aug 2010

The plaintiff, Vanita Dilip Chawla, filed a suit seeking a declaration that she is the registered proprietor of the trade name 'Bhagat Tarachand' and ...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)