High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Appeals Filed Against Single Judge Order in Land Acquisition Matters Involving KIADB. Appeals Challenge Order Dated 04.07.2025 in Various Writ Petitions Filed by Landowners and Developers.
29 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "BTM Layout"
124 result(s) found
Found 124 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeals by Market Committee in Land Acquisition Case — Upholds Single Judge's Order Quashing Acquisition Notification for Lack of Public Purpose and Non-Compliance with Statutory Provisions.
25 Feb 2025The case involves a batch of writ appeals filed by the Special Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee for Fruits and Vegetables (the appellant) agai...
- 50
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Multiple Writ Petitions on Land Acquisition Lapse. Petitioners contend that acquisition proceedings lapsed under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Sections 24, 25 of the 2013 Act due to non-making of award within prescribed period.
6 Sep 2022These writ petitions were filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging land acquisition proceedings. The petitioners, who...
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Trial Court Order on Impleading Parties in Suit for Partition and Injunction — Upholds Order Allowing Impleading of Subsequent Purchasers as Necessary Parties Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.
29 Jun 2022The petitioner, H.P. Subbareddy, filed a suit for partition and permanent injunction in respect of certain immovable properties. During the pendency o...
- 121
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Considers Land Acquisition Lapse Challenge Under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Petitioners, landowners, argued that acquisition for BTM Layout had lapsed due to non-payment of compensation, and the appeals arose from a Single Judge's common order dated 14.12.2017.
19 Apr 2021The writ appeals arise from a common order dated 14.12.2017 passed by the Single Judge of the High Court of Karnataka. The appellants, landowners and ...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Flat Buyers Against Developer for Delayed Possession, Holds Unilateral Compensation Clause Unfair. Developer's stipulation of Rs 5 per sq ft per month as liquidated damages for delay held inadequate and unconscionable; flat buyers entitled to compensation at 6% per annum on amounts paid.
24 Aug 2020The case involves appeals by 171 flat buyers against the dismissal of their consumer complaint by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ...
- 233
High Court
Karnataka High Court Considers Appeals Against Conviction for Murder and State's Appeal for Fine. Case Involves Issues of Identity, Motive, and Recovery Under Sections 302 and 34 IPC.
15 Mar 2019The appeals arose from the judgment of the Fast Track (Sessions) Judge-V, Bengaluru City, in S.C. No. 1199/2012, convicting the accused under Section ...
- 19
High Court
- 18
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging BDA Allotment of Site to Public Library Department — Allotment Upheld as Valid and Not Contrary to Law. The court held that the allotment of a civic amenity site for a public library is a lawful public purpose and the petitioner society had no locus standi to challenge the same.
9 Dec 2013The petitioner, MICO Employees' House Building Co-operative Society Limited, a registered co-operative society under the Karnataka Co-operative Societ...
- 59
