Search Results for "BPCL"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "BPCL"

94 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 94 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Ruling on Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited: A Complex Case Involving Coal Block Allocation and Legal Interpretations. A detailed examination of the legal challenges surrounding the joint venture agreements, audit reports, and allegations of criminal conspiracy in the coal mining sector.

23 Aug 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed the appeals filed by M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited and its Managing Director, challenging the charges fr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Height Restrictions Near Naval Air Station — No Violation of Right to Development Found. Height restrictions imposed under Section 9A of the Aircraft Act, 1934 and Rule 44 of the Aircraft Rules, 1937 for safety of aircraft operations are reasonable and not arbitrary.

9 Dec 2022

The petitioners, Vikram Delite Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., Shree Ramkrishn Enterprises, and Parikshit Miglani, filed a writ petition under Arti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Penalty Under Central Sales Tax Act for Alleged Misuse of Registration Certificate. Court Holds That Mere Issuance of C-Forms Without Actual Inter-State Movement Does Not Attract Penalty Under Section 10(d) of CST Act, 1956.

13 Feb 2019

The petitioner, M/s. Brijda Roadlines Pvt. Ltd., a transport company engaged in the business of transportation and holding a dealership from Bharat Pe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Notices Against Defendant in Patent Infringement Suit — No Willful Disobedience Found. Court holds that breach of an order must be willful and deliberate to constitute contempt under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC, and mere technical or inadvertent violations do not attract punishment.

28 Jun 2016

The Plaintiff, CTR Manufacturing Industries Ltd., filed a patent infringement suit against Sergi Transformer Explosion Prevention Technologies Pvt. Lt...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Dealer in Termination Dispute. No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as Arbitrator's Findings Were Plausible and Not Perverse.

25 Jul 2012

The Petitioner, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL), a government oil company, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Tribunal's Predeposit Order for Public Sector Undertaking in Central Excise Matter - Prima Facie Case and Financial Solvency Must Be Considered Under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court held that a Public Sector Undertaking of substantial worth and solvency cannot be directed to predeposit 50% of duty without considering its prima facie case and ability to secure revenue by bond.

28 Jun 2011

The appellant, M/s. Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilisers Ltd., a Public Sector Undertaking and Government Company under Section 617 of the Companies Act,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Communication of Grounds in Tamil Language — Right to Make Effective Representation Violated Under Article 22(5) of Constitution of India. The court held that failure to provide grounds of detention in a language understood by the illiterate Tamil-speaking detenu infringed his constitutional right to make an effective representation, rendering the detention illegal.

19 Oct 2006

The petitioner, Anna Durai @ Dilli Ganpati Devendra, an illiterate Tamil-speaking person residing in Mumbai, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Refund Case. Principles of Unjust Enrichment Under Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 Not Applicable to Refund Arising on Finalisation of Provisional Assessment.

20 Dec 2005

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai II appealed against the order of the appellate authorities below which allowed the refund claim of M/s. Sta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Against Levy of Excise Duty on Fabrication and Construction of Structurals - Activities Do Not Amount to Manufacture Under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Fabrication at site results in immovable property, not excisable goods.

29 Apr 2005

The judgment concerns two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by M/s Shapoorji Pallonji & Co. and Ceat Tyres of India ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Structures by Municipal Corporation. Petitioners Failed to Establish Legal Right or Authorization for Constructions on Public Land.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by various individuals and entities challenging the demolition of structures by the Municipal Corp...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)