Search Results for "Adjournments"

303 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 303 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal and Convicts Accused Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Compromise Cheque Dishonour Leads to Conviction as Accused Failed to Rebut Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt.

The case involves a criminal appeal filed by the complainant, Damodhar Murlidhar Bajaj, against the acquittal of the accused, Ratan Suryabhan Shinde, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition, Upholds Ex Parte Eviction Decree Against Tenant for Subletting. Tenant's Delay in Seeking to Set Aside Decree Not Condoned as Reliance on Advocate's Assurance Without Follow-Up Does Not Constitute Sufficient Cause Under Article 123 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The petitioner, Smt. Taramati Bhagwandas Vithlani, is the owner of a chawl in Kurla, Mumbai. The first respondent was a tenant in Room No.238. The pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Speedy Trial in Negotiable Instruments Act Case Due to Routine Adjournments Causing Harassment to Accused. Trial Court Directed to Complete Proceedings Within Sixty Days Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, Gangani Resorts Pvt. Ltd., was the accused in Criminal Case No. OA/641/2003/C pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class (J.M....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Striking Off Written Statements in Commercial Suit — Time Limit of 120 Days Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC and Section 16 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Is Mandatory and Cannot Be Extended.

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed by defendants in a commercial suit instituted by Tata Steel Ltd. (respondent) for recovery of amount...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Allegation of Sexual Assault Fails as Victim's Testimony Contradicted by Medical Evidence and Delay in FIR.

The appellant, Manikandan, was convicted by the Sessions (Fast Track Mahila) Judge, Namakkal, for offences under Sections 5(l) and 5(j)(ii) of the Pro...