Search Results for "Action Ispat case"

166 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 166 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Discharge in Cheque Dishonour Case — Prima Facie Case Made Out Under Section 138 NI Act. No Interference Warranted as Magistrate's Order Based on Material Evidence.

The present criminal revision application was filed by Yogesh Premjibhai Suvariya and another (the petitioners/accused) challenging the order dated 08...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal Against Confiscation Orders Under Central Excise Act and SARFAESI Act. Commissioner's Use of Omitted Rule 173Q(2) Invalid and SARFAESI Act Grants Priority to Secured Creditors Over Excise Dues.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by Punjab National Bank. The bank had extended credit fa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Reinstatement of Contract Labourers in SAIL Mines Despite Finding Contract Genuine. High Court's Direction for Regularisation Consideration Under Para 125 of SAIL Judgment Affirmed, Back Wages Denied.

The case involves a long-standing industrial dispute between the Steel Authority of India Ltd. (SAIL), a government undertaking, and the Ispat Khadan ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010479002008_1

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification on Mining Leases; Examines Legislative Competence under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act.

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the validity of Notification No. FEE/23/2007-08 dated 16.08.2008 is...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Clarifies Certified Copy Requirement for Filing Appeal Under Section 61 of IBC, 2016. The court held that an uncertified copy can be filed, but limitation runs from receipt of certified copy.

This judgment arises from a reference made to a single member bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) at Chennai due to a dissent...