Search Results for "2009 amendment"

4022 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4022 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Amendment Application in Partition Suit. Amendment Sought After Commencement of Trial Not Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC Due to Lack of Due Diligence.

The petitioners, Hemlata Harish Bhatia and Bharat Vallabhdas Bhatia, filed a suit for partition in 2004 against the respondents, Vallabhdas Lalchand D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Property Dispute Between Siblings. Court holds that amendment seeking to add alternative claim for partition and separate possession does not change the nature of the suit and is necessary for effective adjudication.

The petitioners, Barkatali Abdul Razzak Kazi, Noorjahan Gafoor Shijwalkar, and Aishabi Jabbar Thakur, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Written Statement in Specific Performance Suit. Mistake of Counsel Held Not to Prejudice Defendant's Right to Fair Trial — Amendment Allowed as Explanatory and Necessary for Real Controversy.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for specific performance of contract dated 02.03.2003 against the respondents. During the trial, af...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considered Challenge to Family Court Order Rejecting Amendment in Divorce Petition Under Article 227. The Core Issue Was Whether Post-Trial Amendment Seeking Property Sale Relief Constituted a Bar under Order VI Rule 17 CPC and Changed the Suit's Nature.

The Bombay High Court heard a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Family Court, Mumbai, which had...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Amendment of Plaint in Civil Suit — Due Diligence Test Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC Not Applicable Before Commencement of Trial. Trial Court Erred in Rejecting Amendment Application on Ground of Lack of Due Diligence When Trial Had Not Commenced.

The petitioners, plaintiffs in a civil suit (O.S. No. 188/2015) pending before the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Hungund, filed an application (IA ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Amendment Application in Civil Suit — Amendment Sought After Trial Commenced Without Showing Due Diligence. Order VI Rule 17 CPC Proviso Bars Amendment After Trial Commences Unless Due Diligence is Shown.

The petitioner, Chandrashekhar Pandurang Tumsare, was the defendant in a civil suit. He filed an application under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement in Civil Suit — Liberal Approach to Pleadings Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC. The court held that an amendment to amplify an existing plea should be liberally allowed before trial, and the due diligence requirement is not an absolute bar.

The petitioner, Shri Cesar Augusto do Rego Fernandes, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Civil Judge, Junior Division at Panaji, which ...