Search Results for "substantial damage"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "substantial damage"

914 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 914 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Willful Breach of Consent Terms — No Willful Disobedience Established as Order Was Ambiguous and Compliance Was Substantial. The court held that ambiguity in the order must be resolved in favor of the alleged contemnor and that contempt requires proof of willful and deliberate disobedience beyond reasonable doubt.

4 May 2026

The contempt petition was filed by Dr. Hari Tulshiram Gholap and Dr. Prabiha Hari Gholap (original plaintiffs) against Shri Jitendra Rajaram Savant an...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Against Bank Forfeiture — Directs Refund of Rs.24.10 Lakhs Deposit with Interest. Forfeiture of deposit without contractual authority in auction sale is arbitrary and unjust, warranting refund with interest at 6% per annum.

20 Apr 2022

The petitioner, P Balaji Babu, participated in an auction conducted by the State Bank of India (respondent No.1) for the sale of immovable property ow...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by State Undertaking in BOT Arbitration Dispute, Upholds Arbitral Award on Termination Payment. Court Reiterates Limited Scope of Judicial Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Emphasizing Finality of Arbitral Awards.

29 May 2026

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation Ltd. (MPRDC) against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh Hi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Allowing Oral Evidence in Temporary Injunction Proceedings Under Order 39 Rule 1 CPC. The Court has inherent jurisdiction to permit oral evidence for just and effective adjudication of interim injunction applications.

27 Apr 2018

The petitioner, Babulal Onkardas Kabra, was the original defendant in a suit filed by the respondents, Nilesh, Shailesh, and Rakesh Pukhraj Rathod, in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Denial of Environmental Clearance for Port Capacity Enhancement. The court upheld the Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change's decision based on environmental concerns and the National Green Tribunal's order, finding no grounds for interference under Article 226.

24 Apr 2018

The petitioner, South West Port Limited, a company engaged in coal import, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challe...

High Court

Madras High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Defamatory Social Media Posts in Personality Rights Case. Court restrains respondent from publishing defamatory content about applicant's character and professional reputation pending trial.

7 Jan 2026

The applicant, T. Rangaraj, filed a suit seeking permanent injunction and other reliefs against the respondent, Ms. Joy Crizildaa, and John Doe/s, all...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demand for ₹215.75 Crores for Unlawful Mining of Iron Ore. Petitioner's Mining Lease Renewal Deemed Granted Under Section 8(3) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, and Extraction Was Lawful.

23 Aug 2017

The petitioner, M/s Deepchand Kishenlal, a registered partnership firm, held a mining lease originally granted in 1954 for manganese ore and kaolin, w...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Validity of Notification Withdrawing Land from Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 After Possession Taken. Issue Concerns Whether Withdrawal Is Permissible When Acquisition Proceedings Had Attained Finality and Possession Was Taken Years Earlier.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute concerned the validity of a notification under Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 withdrawing Survey No. 50 (6 acres 20 guntas) ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court's Restoration of Land Acquisition Withdrawal Notification Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appeals raise the issue whether the State Government could validly withdraw from acquisition after possession had been taken, and whether the writ petition by land owners was barred by res judicata.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute pertains to the acquisition of land for the formation of BTM Layout by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). In 1977, the State of Ka...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Whether Withdrawal of Land Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Permissible After Possession Had Already Been Taken. Dispute Centered on Notification Dated 12.04.2001 Withdrawing Acquisition of Survey No.50 Despite Prior Possession and Multiple Dismissals of Challenges by Land Owners.

1 Aug 2026

Judgment Analysis - Auto Generated...

47 48 49 50 51

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)