Search Results for "section 391"

574 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 574 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Criminal Appeals Against Conviction for Murder Under Sections 147, 148, 302/149 IPC. The Court Assessed the Evidence of a Sole Interested Eye-Witness and the Effect of Hostile Witnesses.

The two criminal appeals arise from Sessions Case No. 234 of 2008, wherein the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune convicted six accused persons for the m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Miscellaneous Second Appeal Filed Against Order of Remand in Suit Seeking Direction to Conduct Mass in Konkani Language. High Court Examines Whether Civil Court Has Jurisdiction Over Religious Language Policy Dispute.

This miscellaneous second appeal arose from a suit filed by four Konkani‑speaking Catholic individuals against the Bishop of the Diocese of Chikkama...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Passes Order in Writ Petition on Police Assistance for Injunction Implementation — Trial Court's Direction Under Section 151 CPC Challenged for Res Judicata and Possession Violations

The writ petition arose from a civil suit (O.S. No. 1708/2024) filed by the respondent-plaintiff against the petitioners-defendants seeking a declarat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Accidental Fall Not Suicide. Death of a passenger falling from a train and being run over is an 'untoward incident' under Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989, and the railway is liable for compensation under Section 124-A.

The present appeal was filed by the appellants, Ramesh Laxmanrao Dighade and Mrs. Sindhu w/o Ramesh Dighade, being aggrieved by the judgment and award...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Railway Parcel Space Lease Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's finding that claimant failed to prove termination of contract and is not entitled to refund of security deposit.

The petitioner, Prajapati Gunwant Keshavlal, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral ...