Search Results for "reference jurisdiction"

14648 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 14648 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Industrial Dispute Case — Termination of Workmen Held Illegal for Non-Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Employer Failed to Prove Abandonment of Service by Workmen, and Reinstatement with Back Wages Upheld.

The appellant, M/s. Indo-European Breweries Ltd, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 3212...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Arbitrator's Orders Refusing to Decide Jurisdiction as Preliminary Issue. Arbitrator Must Rule on Jurisdiction at Threshold Under Section 16 of Arbitration Act, 1940.

The petitioner, M/s. Northroof Ventures Private Limited (formerly M/s. Nitesh Housing Developers Pvt. Ltd.), a company incorporated under the Companie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Employer's Forfeiture of Gratuity for Employee Convicted of Theft Involving Moral Turpitude. Theft by Bank Employee Constitutes Moral Turpitude Under Section 4(6)(b)(ii) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Justifying Forfeiture of Gratuity.

The petitioners, officials of the Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the order of the Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Daughter's Appeal Against Dismissal of Petition Challenging Father's Marriage Under Order 2 Rule 2 CPC. Family Court Erred in Holding That Earlier Suit for Declaration of Marriage as Void Was Barred by Res Judicata as Cause of Action Was Different.

The appellant, Mrs. Nayana M. Ramani, is the married daughter of late Mr. Navnitlal R. Shah. The respondent, Mrs. Fizzah Navnitlal Shah, claims to hav...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Claim for Short-Landed Cargo Due to Lack of Evidence and Limitation. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove that the consignment was loaded on board the vessel and that the suit was barred by limitation under the Indian Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925.

The plaintiff, Wallace Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for recovery of US$154,000 representing the CIF value of 40 drums of Lincomycin HCL BP ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Anti-Suit Injunction Restraining English Proceedings in Breach of Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause. Exclusive jurisdiction clause in EDA held binding despite subsequent MOU; strong cause not shown by defendants.

The Plaintiff, Hansraj Nayyar Medical India, a proprietorship engaged in selling medical products, filed a suit for anti-suit injunction against Smith...