Search Results for "put option deed"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "put option deed"

605 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 605 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Property Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Patently Illegal or Contrary to Public Policy. The court upheld the arbitrator's interpretation of the agreement for sale and the direction to refund the amount paid with interest, finding no error in the award.

7 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Vasanji Assaria Mamania, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral awar...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Landlord's Appeal in Rent Control and Municipal Demolition Case, Upholding Tenant's Statutory Protection and Damages Award. The Court affirmed that statutory protection under the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 overrides municipal demolition powers under the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976, and that the tenant's suit for damages was not barred under Order II Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

14 Sep 2021

The dispute originated from the demolition of a rented building by the Bangalore City Corporation, leading to litigation between the tenant and the la...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Electricity Duty Exemption Case: Promissory Estoppel Not Applicable Due to Lack of Clear Representation and Public Interest. The court held that the Industrial Policy 2012 did not create an enforceable right to retrospective exemption, and the notification under Section 9 of the Bihar Electricity Duty Act, 1948 was validly made prospective.

1 Dec 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Jharkhand against the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court, which had directed the State to...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Abetment to Suicide Case Against Lenders Due to Lack of Instigation. Suicide Note Did Not Mention Applicants; Mere Loan Recovery Not Sufficient to Attract Section 306 IPC.

29 Mar 2019

The applicants, Imran Khan and Gulnaz Khan, were lenders who had advanced money to the deceased, Jugram Lanjewar. Jugram committed suicide by hanging ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956 for Debt Disputed in Good Faith. Petition Filed to Exert Pressure for Unreasonable Demands, Not for Recovery of Genuine Debt.

7 Jun 2006

The petitioner, Fomento Resorts And Hotels Ltd., filed a winding up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 against the respondent, G...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Interim Relief in Redevelopment Contract Dispute. Non-Cooperating Members of Cooperative Housing Society Face Motion for Injunction and Mandatory Orders.

16 Sep 2013

The plaintiff, a developer, filed suit for specific performance of a redevelopment contract against a cooperative housing society and some of its non-...

Tribunals

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1422 of 2024

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Conditions for Land Conversion — Land Granted on New and Impartible Tenure Remains Occupancy Class II and Subject to Unearned Income Payment Under Section 29 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

10 Jan 2017

The petitioner, M/s. Niketan Land and Estate Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 24/02/2010 passed by the Collector, Nashik, which allowed the conver...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint and Grants Temporary Injunction in Property Dispute — Concurrent Orders of Courts Below Set Aside. Amendment Sought to Correct Description of Suit Property Held to Be Necessary for Effective Adjudication, and Prima Facie Case, Balance of Convenience, and Irreparable Injury Found in Favour of Plaintiff.

22 Jul 2021

The petitioner, M/s. Vaishnavi Sai Shri Mahalaxmi Jagdamba Shikshan Sanstha, filed two writ petitions challenging concurrent orders of the Small Cause...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Decree-Holder's Petition Under Article 227 in Execution Proceedings — Order XXI Rule 41 CPC Mandates Judgment-Debtor to File Affidavit of Assets. The Court held that the Commercial Court erred in dismissing the application for asset disclosure without considering the mandatory nature of Order XXI Rule 41 CPC.

30 Jul 2025

The petitioner, Ms. Sumita Abhishek Sundaram, is the decree-holder in a commercial execution proceeding (Com. Ex. 541 of 2024) pending before the LXXX...

47 48 49 50 51

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)