Search Results for "property title dispute"

4552 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4552 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Suit Challenging Compromise Decree. Interpretation of Kachhi Properties Judgment Clarified: No Automatic Stay of Execution Proceedings Upon Filing of Suit for Declaration that Decree is Void.

The Bombay High Court heard two appeals from orders rejecting temporary injunction applications. The first appeal (AO 884/2010) challenged an order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Partition Suit in Family Property Dispute — Plaintiff Entitled to 1/5th Share. Co-owner's Right to Partition Upheld Despite Unproven Allegations of Oral Partition and Will.

The suit was filed by Indira Rajguru, a resident of the United Kingdom, against her brothers and sister (defendants) for partition and separate posses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Probate Granted to Executors of Will — Will Proved in Manner Required by Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Evidence Act, 1872

The appeal arose from a probate proceeding concerning the Will of Purvez Burjor Dalal, a Parsi who died on 7th December 2011. The appellant, Manek Dar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Will and Adverse Possession. The court held that the document dated 24.10.1960 was a Will and not a settlement deed, and that the appellant failed to prove adverse possession.

The case involves a Regular Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the judgment and decree dated 30....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Possession Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Ownership and Possession Upheld. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC when findings of fact are based on evidence and not perverse.

The case involves a property dispute between two brothers, Gulab (plaintiff) and Ajab (defendant no.2), over a building constructed on Municipal Plot ...