Search Results for "oral evidence required"

10163 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10163 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Bribery Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Deorao Marotrao Bhagatkar, was the Principal of Kendriya Vidyalaya, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Chandrapur, in S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape and Kidnapping of Minor - Seven-Year Sentence Affirmed. Consistent Testimony of Prosecutrix and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 363 and 376 IPC.

The appellant, Balaji Maruti Kamble, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Latur, for offences under Sections 363 and 376 of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's evidence was inconsistent and not supported by medical or other evidence.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by the appellants (accused No.1 and 2) against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 10.12.2013 p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 324 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Shaikh Javed and Shaikh Asad, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad for offences under Sections 302 and 324 read...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eye-Witnesses and Tainted Recovery. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by Shrikant Ankushrao Bramhane and Sachin Shankarrao Dehane against their conviction for the murder of Ka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Shareholder Dispute Over Hotel Company Exit — Holds That Arbitrator Exceeded Jurisdiction by Granting Relief Beyond Scope of Reference and Without Proper Valuation.

The judgment pertains to two Commercial Arbitration Petitions arising from an arbitral award dated 5th April 2016. The petitioners (Panchamias Group a...