Search Results for "lawyer's office"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "lawyer's office"

636 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 636 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Partnership Dispute Under Section 11(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Dispute Arises from Partnership Deed Dated 10/03/2008 and Reconstitution Deed. Court Holds That Existence of Arbitration Clause and Failure of Respondent to Appoint Arbitrator Justifies Appointment by Court.

12 Feb 2025

The petitioners, Sri. S. Shivakumar and Smt. H. Girija, partners of M/S SGH Rural Godown, filed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 11(5) of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Complainant Failed to Prove Service of Demand Notice on Accused.

20 Apr 2011

The petitioner, Jogen C. Thakkar, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Declares Respondent Vexatious Litigant Under Maharashtra Vexatious Litigation (Prevention) Act, 1971 for Habitually Filing Baseless Proceedings Against Tenant. Landlord-Tenant Dispute Leads to Declaration of Vexatious Litigant Due to Habitual Filing of Frivolous Applications and Abusive Conduct.

6 May 2011

The Advocate General for the State of Maharashtra filed a petition under Section 2(1) of the Maharashtra Vexatious Litigation (Prevention) Act, 1971, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Police Assistance for Possession in Property Dispute — Petitioner Must Pursue Civil Remedies for Trespass After Execution of Decree.

10 Oct 2011

The petitioner, Pushpalata Gopal Worlikar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Set Aside Ex Parte Restoration Order Due to Misleading Adjournment — Defendants Denied Opportunity of Hearing. Court holds that restoration of suit without notice to defendants violates principles of natural justice and Order IX Rule 13 CPC.

17 Nov 2011

The petitioner, Patel Engineering Limited, was the original defendant in Short Cause Suit No.2987 of 2002 filed by the respondent, United Real Estate ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Salary Attachment Order in Co-operative Bank Recovery Proceedings Due to Lack of Jurisdiction. Registrar Not Notified as Arbitrator Under Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002, Rendering Proceedings Void.

10 Dec 2012

The petitioner, Major Allan Victor de Souza, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging two orders: (1) a judgment and orde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Loan Recovery Dispute — Upholds Award of Rs. 3.01 Crore with 18% Interest. Court holds that the Arbitrator's findings on liability and interest rate are not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 Mar 2019

This judgment arises from a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Meenu Arora, Raj Kumar Arora, Ethics Exp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit — Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Swisskem Healthcare & Anr. — 'PANDERM' and 'POLYDERM+' Held Deceptively Similar. The Court held that the marks are structurally and phonetically similar, and the Defendant's use is likely to cause confusion, especially in medicinal products where a high degree of care is expected.

2 Jul 2019

The Plaintiff, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the Defendants, Swisskem Healthcare and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Share Dispute Due to Civil Nature. Dispute over share purchase agreement held to be purely contractual, not constituting criminal breach of trust or cheating under Sections 406, 420, 120B IPC.

8 Aug 2019

The petitioners, Rohan Dukle and Sudhir Gudal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Cri...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Discharge of Accused Director in Cheque Dishonour Case — Resignation Prior to Cheque Issuance Absolves Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court held that a director who resigned before the cheques were issued cannot be held vicariously liable under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

23 Aug 2019

The applicant, Ramesh Pahulraj Makhija, was original accused No.6 in Criminal Complaint No.538 of 2003 filed by Respondent No.2 under Section 138 of t...

47 48 49 50 51

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)