Search Results for "land revenue arrears"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "land revenue arrears"

696 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 696 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds First Appellate Court's Declaration of Unlawful Possession and Order for Vacant Possession. The Court held that the plaintiff failed to prove tenancy rights and that the defendant's title by sale deed from mortgagee was valid, rejecting the plaintiff's claim of adverse possession.

5 Mar 2024

The case involves a property dispute over City Survey No. 2463 at Wai, Satara. The plaintiff, Ramesh Anandrao Shirke (since deceased, represented by l...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased Were Gratuitous Passengers in Goods Vehicle, Not Covered Under Insurance Policy. The court held that under Section 95 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, an insurance policy for a goods vehicle does not cover passengers carried for hire or reward, and the deceased were not employees of the owner, thus the insurer is not liable.

12 Mar 2010

The case involves two appeals filed by the United India Insurance Co. Ltd. against the award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal. The accident occu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute Between Siblings — Daughter Held Entitled to Share in Ancestral Property Under Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Court clarifies that daughter's right to inherit from father dying in 1944 is governed by the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and not by pre-1956 customary law, as the Act applies retrospectively for succession opening after its commencement.

1 Apr 2019

The case involves a dispute between a brother (defendant/appellant) and his sister (plaintiff/respondent) over ancestral agricultural land. Their fath...

High Court

Bombay High Court Disposes of Multiple Writ Petitions Involving Slum Rehabilitation Authority — Relief Not Specified as Judgment Text Only Contains Cause Title and Advocates. The batch includes Writ Petition No. 3140 of 2019 and connected matters, with petitioners seeking various reliefs against the State of Maharashtra and the Slum Rehabilitation Authority.

30 Dec 2025

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, Division Bench) delivered a judgment on December 30, 2025, in a batch of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Section 9 Petition as Misuse of Process in Redevelopment Dispute with Non-Member Occupant. Court holds that a developer cannot seek interim relief against a non-signatory occupant under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, where the occupant has independent rights and is not bound by the arbitration agreement.

30 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Gulshan Townplanners LLP, a developer, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Registered Suo Motu by Police Under MRTP Act — Police Officer Lacks Authority to Register FIR Under Section 154 CrPC for Offences Under Sections 43 and 52 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966

17 Feb 2011

The petitioner, Mahesh Shivram Puthran, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an FIR registered by the poli...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Order Rejecting Plaint in Property Suit — Limitation Period for Suit Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 Is Six Months from Date of Dispossession, Not from Date of Knowledge. Plaint cannot be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC based on disputed facts regarding possession.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Ganpat Shankar Chougule, filed a suit in the Bombay City Civil Court seeking possession of a property under Section 6 of the Specific R...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Quashes Prosecution Under MRTP Act Due to Limitation Bar — Non-Compliance with Demolition Notice Held Not a Continuing Offence. The Court held that offence under Section 53(7) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, is complete upon failure to comply with notice within prescribed period, and the mere continuance of unauthorized construction does not keep the offence alive for purposes of limitation under Section 468 Cr.P.C.

12 Feb 2013

The petitioners, who were accused in a criminal case under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, challenged the rejection of their ple...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Against Illegal Hoardings in Aurangabad — Municipal Corporation Directed to Enforce Ban and Revise Advertisement Rates. Defacement of Public Property and Traffic Obstruction Addressed Under Municipal Corporation's Regulatory Powers.

10 Jun 2010

The petitioner, Sunil Pandharinath Jadhav, a resident of Aurangabad, filed a writ petition in public interest before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging FEMA Adjudication Orders for Lack of Jurisdiction and Limitation. Petitioners' challenge to show cause notices and adjudication orders under FEMA fails as writ petitions are not maintainable against mere show cause notices and are barred by delay and laches.

19 Nov 2022

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging show cause notices and adjudication order...

47 48 49 50 51

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)