Search Results for "discretionary grant"

1831 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1831 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Protecting the Fundamental Right to Liberty under Article 21. Illegal Arrest of a Decorated Police Officer: Bombay High Court Awards Compensation for Violation of Fundamental Rights.

The Bombay High Court, in the case of Sambhaji Achyutrao Patil v. State of Maharashtra & Ors., addressed the illegal arrest and detention of a se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Permanent Stay of Winding Up of Svadeshi Mills Company Limited. Section 466 of Companies Act, 1956 does not permit stay of winding up after assets have been sold and substantial progress made in liquidation.

The case concerns an appeal against the dismissal of a company application under Section 466 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking a permanent stay of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Head Mistress Against School Tribunal Order Restoring Respondent Teacher to Head Post - Appointment of Appellant Held Valid Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act, 1977

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Smt. Nirmala Revappa Pattanshetti against an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds CAT Order Directing NIMHANS to Grant Child Care Leave to Employee. Child Care Leave is a Statutory Right Under Central Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1972, Not a Discretionary Benefit.

The petitioner, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), challenged an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Ben...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Interest on Suspension Period Amount Due to Delay in Seeking Reinstatement. Appellant's Own Delay in Reporting for Duty After Acquittal Disentitles Him to Interest on Differential Amount Paid on Reinstatement.

The appellant, Riteshkumar Narendrabhai Patel, was an Assistant Teacher who was arrested on 09.02.2005 and suspended on 28.06.2005. He was enlarged on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appellant's Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell Dated 31.07.2007 Proved and Plaintiff's Readiness and Willingness Established Under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant-defendant filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree date...