Search Results for "deemed settlement"

1778 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1778 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Consolidation of Cooperative Disputes for Joint Trial — Revision Order Upheld. Common questions of law and fact justified consolidation under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioner, Tarkude Hotels Pvt. Ltd., filed a dispute (No.254/2006) before the Cooperative Court, Pune, against The Rupee Cooperative Bank Ltd. an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Bank's Wilful Defaulter Declaration for Violating Natural Justice. Show-cause notice lacking specific grounds renders the decision invalid under RBI Master Circular on Wilful Defaulters.

The petitioners, Nitin Shah, Rahul Shah, and Kunal Shah, who were directors of Nitin Fire Protection Industries Ltd. (the corporate debtor under CIRP)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 371 OF 2019

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition and Allows Workmen's Petition in Gratuity and Bonus Dispute. Employer's Liability Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Continues Despite Partnership Dissolution and Court Receivership.

The judgment involves two connected writ petitions arising from the same factual matrix concerning a partnership firm, Daulatram Dyeing and Bleaching ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Commissioner's Order on Retirement Age and Back Wages. Workman Held Entitled to Wages Including Back Wages Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, M/s Sirsat Lodge, challenged an order dated 12.11.2013 passed by the Commissioner, Labour and Employment, Panaji, in CLE/(REC-17)/2011...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for Insurance Compensation for Crop Loss Due to Pest Attack. Court holds that pest attack is not an insured peril under the Crop Insurance Scheme and that the petitioner failed to establish any legal duty or right to claim compensation.

The petitioner, Libaraj s/o Tulshiram Tikle, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Aurang...