Search Results for "compensation under 2013 Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "compensation under 2013 Act"

3754 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3754 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Railway Project. Publication in Official Gazette and Local Newspapers Held Sufficient Compliance Under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, 70 individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of their lands for t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Section 18A of SC/ST Act Against Challenge of Unconstitutionality — Amendment Restores Pre-Dr. Subhash Kashinath Position After Review

10 Feb 2020

The petitioners challenged the constitutional validity of Section 18A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 198...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Caste Validity Certificates — Employer Lacks Locus Standi Under Maharashtra Caste Certificate Act, 2000. Corporation Cannot Challenge Certificates Issued to Employees as Only Person Aggrieved or State Government Can Do So.

20 Aug 2024

The Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (PCMC) filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the caste validity certificates issue...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition and First Appeal Challenging Stop Work Notice and Revocation of Commencement Certificate for Public Parking Lot Construction; Considers Whether Deemed Permission Under Regulation 6(4) of DCR 1991 Was Obtained and Whether Natural Justice Was Violated. The Court Examines Legal Validity of Notice Issued Under Section 51 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 and Section 354A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, in Context of Completed Construction of 15 Upper Floors of PPL Based on Incentive FSI Under Clause 24 of Regulation 33.

27 Jan 2016

The matter arose from construction activities undertaken by Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Limited on Plot No.5B+6 at Worli, Mumbai, involving a high-...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition by MSEDCL Without Due Process — Acquisition of Land for Electricity Sub-Station Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that the acquisition of land by MSEB without following the procedure under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, is illegal and directed restoration of possession or payment of compensation.

5 Jan 2024

The petitioners, owners of land admeasuring 6685 sq.mtrs at Village Panchpakhadi, Thane, challenged the acquisition of their land by the Maharashtra S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Public Interest Litigation No. 47 of 2013 Regarding Change of Land Use and Allotment. The court examined the validity of modifying user of a plot from public utility to commercial and the subsequent allotment to a trust.

7 Sep 2016

This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by Citizen Forum For Equality, a registered NGO, challenging the modification of user of a plot in the...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Disposes Four Civil Miscellaneous Petitions Filed Under Sections 11(6) and 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Seeking Appointment of Substitute Arbitrator. Petitioners Contended That Arbitrators Appointed by CPWD Were Ineligible Under Section 12(5) for Want of Mandatory Consent.

19 Sep 2019

The petitioners, M/s. Sri Krishna Shelters Pvt. Ltd., were awarded six construction contracts by the Central Public Works Department (CPWD) for works ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench adjudicates multiple appeals and cross-objections under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, concerning compensation for lands acquired for a minor irrigation tank in Kakhandaki Village. The dispute involves the correct determination of market value following the Reference Court's enhancement from the initial awards of the Land Acquisition Officer.

24 Apr 2020

These appeals under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and cross-objections under Order 41 Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908,...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Petitioners' Claim for Additional Compensation Under Section 30(3) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 on Market Value Including Multiplication Factor-2. The Court held that 'market value' under Section 3(u) includes the multiplication Factor-2 under Section 26(2), and additional compensation must be computed on that enhanced value.

26 Feb 2026

The petitioners, landowners whose land was acquired for railway purposes, challenged the award of additional compensation under Section 30(3) of the R...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Flat Buyers Against Developer for Delayed Possession, Holds Unilateral Compensation Clause Unfair. Developer's stipulation of Rs 5 per sq ft per month as liquidated damages for delay held inadequate and unconscionable; flat buyers entitled to compensation at 6% per annum on amounts paid.

24 Aug 2020

The case involves appeals by 171 flat buyers against the dismissal of their consumer complaint by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ...

47 48 49 50 51

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)