Search Results for "cognizance versus charge"

1077 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1077 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Wireless Telegraphy Act Case for Non-Compliance with Section 155(2) CrPC. FIR registered without prior permission of Magistrate for non-cognizable offence under Section 6 of Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act read with Section 20 of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, held invalid.

The petitioner, Anderson Mark Richard, a British national and former Senior Executive of Offshore Petroleum Industry Training Organization, filed a cr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Fair Investigation in Bank Fraud Case — No Direction to Transfer Investigation to CBI or ACB as Petitioner Not an Aggrieved Party Under Section 154 CrPC. Third-party social worker lacks locus standi to seek transfer of investigation after charge-sheet filed.

The petitioner, Sadashiv Ambadas Gaike, a social worker, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Further Investigation Application in Death Case. Trial Court's Discretion Upheld as Applications Were Filed After Trial Commenced and Key Witnesses Examined.

The petitioner, Rabia Khan, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 16.09.2021 passed by the Special Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Snatching Case Due to Lack of Identification Parade and Recovery. Conviction Under Section 379 IPC Set Aside as Identification in Police Station Without Test Identification Parade is Unreliable and No Recovery from Appellant.

The appellant, Alam Adam Mansuri, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, in Special MCOCA Case No.4 of 2013 for the offence p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Customs Act Case — Confiscation and Penalties Quashed for Lack of Mens Rea. Imported capital goods released on payment of duty; no deliberate intent to evade duty established under Sections 111(d), 111(f), 112(a), and 125 of Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioners, M/s. Central Cables Limited (a company manufacturing electric wires and cables), its Managing Director Govind Daga, and Purchase Offi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail to Accused in MCOC Case for Failure to File Charge Sheet Within 90 Days. Right to Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC is Indefeasible and Cannot Be Defeated by Subsequent Filing of Charge Sheet.

The petitioners were arrested in connection with Crime No.172/2015 registered at Police Station Ajni, Nagpur for offences under Sections 307, 143, 144...