Search Results for "arbitrary date"

5434 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5434 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Examines Interpretation of Provisos to Section 10A(2)(b) of MMDR Act in Writ Petitions. Prospecting Licence Holders Seek Mandamus for Execution of Mining Leases Pending Environmental Clearance.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a group of four writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by companies engaged in mining, seeking v...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Revision Order in FCCB Capital Gains Case; Cost of Acquisition Dispute Between FCCB Scheme and Section 49(2A) of Income-tax Act Examined. Revenue Relied on Section 49(2A) While Petitioner Invoked Clause 7(4) of the 1993 Scheme.

The writ petition under Article 226 was filed before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 29 March 2018 passed by the Commissioner of Inco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Tender Conditions for Sweeping Contract in Nashik Municipal Corporation — Net Worth and Experience Requirements Upheld. Court holds that Clause 3.2.2 and 3.4.2 of RFQ are not arbitrary or discriminatory and are justified for a long-term public hygiene contract.

The petitioner, M/s. Watergrace Products, a proprietorship firm engaged in solid waste management, challenged certain conditions in a Request for Qual...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Fresh Tender for PMC Contract for Versova-Bandra Sea Link Project. Contract Expired by Efflux of Time and No Automatic Renewal Clause Existed, Hence MSRDC's Decision to Float Fresh Tender Upheld.

The petitioner, Louis Beger SAS, a French company with its Asia office in Haryana, was appointed as Project Management Consultant (PMC) by the respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 2393 OF 2017

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Metro Fare Hike; Judicial Review Not Permitted Over Specialist Committee's Decision Under Metro Act. Fare Fixation Committee's Determination Based on Section 34 Prevails Over Contractual Fare Stipulations, Limited to Checking Arbitrariness or Perversity.

The writ petition challenged the Fare Fixation Committee's decision to increase Mumbai Metro fares from Rs.9-13 to Rs.10-110 from January 2015. The pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Constitutional Validity of Air India's Standing Order 17 Which Permits Termination Without Assigning Reasons. The Court Considered Whether Such Unguided Power Violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed by employees of Air India Limited (formerly NACIL) whose services were terminated under Standing Ord...