Search Results for "Seized articles"

2636 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2636 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in NDPS Act Case for Smuggling Heroin in Suitcases. Circumstantial Evidence Including Possession of Keys, Baggage Tags, and Concealment of Contraband Sufficient to Prove Conscious Possession Under Section 21(c) of NDPS Act, 1985.

The appellant, Mrs. Agnes Ruddy Odhoch, a Kenyan national, was convicted by the Special Judge, Greater Mumbai, for offences under Sections 21(c), 23(c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Double Murder and Attempt to Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Motive and Conduct of Accused Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Mohd. Jahir Puttan Khan, was convicted by the 7th Ad-Hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Sewree, Mumbai in Sessions Case No.307 of 2004 for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses. Acquittal Under Sections 302 and 307 IPC Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent, Nina Trambak Tadas, who was charged with murder under Section 302 IPC and a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 392, 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Keshav Shriram Kendre, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedpur, for the murder of Bapurao Shamrao Nagargoje, a driver ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Husband in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for killing wife by strangulation and setting her on fire, relying on last seen theory, motive, and recovery of incriminating articles.

The appellant, Harish Ramesh Pulekar, was convicted by the I/c Adhoc District Judge-I, Thane in Sessions Case No.382 of 2006 for the murder of his wif...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Four Convicts in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Procedural Violations in Search and Seizure Lead to Acquittal of Appellants Convicted Under Section 20(b) of NDPS Act.

The appellants, Pratap Bhimsingh Parera, Gangadhar Babaji Lenaka, Mrs. Savita Pratap Parera, and Mrs. Santoshi Santosh Pradhan, were convicted by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under POCSO Act and IPC for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault and Kidnapping. Trial Court Had Imposed 20 Years Rigorous Imprisonment for Offences Against a Minor.

The appellant, original accused no.1, was convicted in Special (POCSO) Case No.94/2017 by the Extra Joint District Judge and Additional Sessions Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Appeal Against Conviction in Murder Case. The Appeal Challenges the Validity of the Trial Court's Judgment on Grounds of Insufficient Evidence and Lack of Common Intention.

The Criminal Appeal arose from the conviction of four accused persons by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Dharwad, in S.C.No.131/2016 for of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes FIR Under Section 295A IPC and Section 67 IT Act in WhatsApp Group Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Insufficient Evidence -- Petitioner Acquitted of Religious Offence Charges

The Karnataka High Court allowed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash an FIR registered under Section 295A IPC and...