Search Results for "Section 13(1)"

1547 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1547 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Pronounces on MSEDCL's Challenge to Order Permitting Single Point Supply to Condominium Under Section 127 Electricity Act. Appellate Authority Allowed Developer to Supply Electricity to Unit Holders through HT Connection Without Individual Connections.

The dispute pertains to the legality of single point electricity supply to a condominium complex known as Great Eastern Plaza in Pune. The petitioner,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal in Railway Property Theft Case. Prosecution Failed to Prove Theft of Railway Property, Hence Possession Alone Not Sufficient for Conviction Under Section 3(a) of Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966.

The State of Maharashtra filed two appeals against a common judgment dated 04.06.2001 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Railway Court, Pu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Agent of Vessel Liable as Owner for Port Charges Under Major Port Trusts Act. Court Interprets Section 2(o) to Include Agent, Following Supreme Court Precedent, and Finds Defendants Liable for Deficit After Consignment Sale.

The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay, a statutory corporation, filed a suit for recovery of Rs 3,21,369.45 along with interest, being the defic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Section 15J Factors Illustrative in SEBI Penalty Adjudication. Adjudicating Officer Retains Discretion to Consider Mitigating Circumstances Beyond Stipulated Factors Under SEBI Act.

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a reference arising from multiple civil appeals concerning the interpretation of Section 15J of the Securities ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, Considers Election Petition Alleging Improper Rejection of Nomination Under Section 9A of Representation of the People Act, 1951. Petitioner Claims Retirement from Partnership Firm Removed Disqualification Before Scrutiny Date.

The petitioner, a former partner in M/s. Musale Construction, intended to contest the 2014 Maharashtra Legislative Assembly election from 49-Saoner co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Redevelopment Dispute; Developer Challenges Directions to Amend Building Plans and Pay Compensation. Court's Decision Awaited.

The dispute pertained to redevelopment of a cooperative housing society's property. The respondent society, owner of a plot in Andheri, Mumbai, appoin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Civil Appeal in Arbitration Dispute, Restoring Arbitral Award Modified by Lower Courts. Judicial Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is Limited, and Courts Cannot Re-appreciate Evidence or Modify Awards on Merits.

The dispute arose from a construction contract between a civil engineering contractor and the Karnataka State Public Works Department for building off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Metro Fare Hike; Judicial Review Not Permitted Over Specialist Committee's Decision Under Metro Act. Fare Fixation Committee's Determination Based on Section 34 Prevails Over Contractual Fare Stipulations, Limited to Checking Arbitrariness or Perversity.

The writ petition challenged the Fare Fixation Committee's decision to increase Mumbai Metro fares from Rs.9-13 to Rs.10-110 from January 2015. The pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Suit for Specific Performance Against Cooperative Housing Society and Members Due to Lack of Privity and Authority. The court held that a cooperative society cannot bind its members to a development agreement without their consent, and the suit was not maintainable.

The plaintiff, Vardhman Developers Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of a development agreement against Borla Co-operative Housing Society L...