Search Results for "POCSO Act, 2012"

558 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 558 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Conviction on Uncharged Act and Non-Consideration of Defence Evidence. Conviction for rape under Section 376 IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act set aside as trial court convicted for a different incident than charged without altering charge.

The appellant, Abdul Rajak Chapparban, was convicted by the Children's Court for offences under Section 376 and 506 IPC, Section 8(2) of the Goa Child...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 5(n) read with Section 6 of POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Eshwar, was convicted by the LIV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, in Special C.C. No. 597/2014 for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Transfer of Juvenile to Adult Court in POCSO Case. Preliminary assessment under Section 15 of JJ Act, 2015 upheld as valid and unbiased.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by Mustafa Khan Jabbar Khan, a juvenile in conflict with law, challenging the judgment and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Grants Bail to Accused in POCSO Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Allegations of Sexual Assault of Minor Not Substantiated Against Accused No.1 Under Sections 4 and 6 of POCSO Act, 2012 and Related IPC Offences.

The petitioner, Sri Rehabare Islam Parvez, accused No.1, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Sexual Assault of Minor Boy Under Goa Children's Act, POCSO Act, and IPC Section 377. Victim's Credible Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Penetrative Sexual Assault and Carnal Intercourse Against Order of Nature.

The appellant, Girish Shirodkar, was convicted by the Children's Court, Goa, for offences under Section 8(2) of the Goa Children's Act, 2003, Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Promise to Marry Case Due to Lack of Evidence of False Promise from Inception. Court holds that breach of promise to marry without proof of initial fraudulent intent does not constitute rape under Section 375 IPC.

The applicant, Shyjeesh K. Thomas, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashment of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in POCSO Case Due to Discrepancies in Victim Statements and Young Age. Cousin Sister Alleged Sexual Assault but Court Found Inconsistencies in Her Statements and Possibility of Reformation of 20-Year-Old Accused.

The applicant, Ritik Suresh Millil, filed a bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking regular bail in connec...