WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.1915 OF 2010
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966"
678 result(s) found
Found 678 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitioners in MRTP Act Purchase Notice Case — Deemed De-reservation Upheld Despite Subsequent Revised Development Plan. Purchase Notice Issued After Draft Revised Plan Valid; Failure to Acquire Within One Year Leads to Deemed De-reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act.
2 Aug 2023The petitioners, owners of land in Pune, issued a purchase notice under Section 127(1) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP A...
- 79
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 515A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Barring Civil Suits Against Demolition Orders. Provision held constitutionally valid as it does not oust writ jurisdiction and provides adequate alternative remedy.
17 Jul 2013The petitioner, Abdul Razzaq Sunesra, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 515A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, inserted b...
- 74
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Writ Petition on Urban Land Ceiling Act Repeal and Possession — Court Analyzes Validity of Dispossession Under Section 10(5) and (6) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.
24 Apr 2017The petitioner, Vijay Kisan Kate, approached the High Court of Bombay by way of a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challen...
- 51
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging CIDCO's Refusal to Grant Lease in Favour of Air India Employees' Cooperative Housing Society. Transfer of Land Allotted to Air India for Staff Quarters Requires Prior Permission of CIDCO Under New Bombay Disposal of Lands Regulations 1975.
24 Jul 2012The petitioners, a cooperative housing society formed by employees of Air India, sought a writ of mandamus directing CIDCO to grant a lease in their f...
- 81
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Lapsing of Land Reservation Due to Inaction by Municipal Authorities Under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966. The court held that a purchase notice under Section 127 substantially complied with requirements and the reservation lapsed as the authorities failed to acquire the land within the statutory period.
24 Aug 2015The petitioners, owners of land Gat No.370, Hissa No.1 at Pen, Raigad, filed a writ petition seeking release of their land from reservation No.7 (Gard...
- 144
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Part Occupation Certificate for Building Height Violation. Flat Purchasers Cannot Seek Revocation of Occupation Certificate as They Have Alternative Remedy Under RERA and No Vested Right to Challenge Planning Permissions.
16 Oct 2018The petitioners, Sanjay Phulwaria and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challe...
- 256
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging BMC Water Charges Revision for Industrial Users — Resolution Held Valid Under Section 169 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. Standing Committee's Power to Revise Water Charges Based on Consumption Upheld as Not Unconstitutional.
19 Mar 2010The petitioners, a company engaged in spinning and weaving textiles and its shareholder, challenged a resolution of the Standing Committee of the Brih...
- 97
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Rejection of Development Permission for Slaughter House. Holds That After Maharashtra Ordinance No. 04/2018, a Private Person Cannot Maintain an Application Under Section 308 of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965.
21 Dec 2018The petitioner, Al Waffi Agro Food Company, a firm engaged in meat supply and export, purchased land admeasuring about 17131.40 sq. mtrs at Village Ba...
- 80
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Hawking Activities on Footpaths in Nariman Point and Churchgate Areas. Court Holds That Hawking Is a Fundamental Right Under Article 19(1)(g) Subject to Reasonable Restrictions, and That Municipal Authorities Have Discretion to Designate Hawking Zones.
30 Nov -0001The petitioners, a group of residents and welfare associations from Nariman Point and Churchgate areas in Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation (...
- 175
